Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 03:46:30
Server time: 00:13:29, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): BMsellar | friedrich3 | jamescfm-kaf | Liu Che | Moderation | SocDemDundorfian | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: RP: Reaffirmation of Parliamentary rules (OOC: after mods advice)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alleanza Radicale - NCD

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4177

Description[?]:

Here a series of rules to regulate the conduct and internal procedures of the Istalian Parliament and Political Practices. All the nation's political parties are obliged to respect this agreement.
Here the link with the bills approved about RP Parliamentary Rules:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=480909
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=382155

OOC: We have to vote again this bill about these RP Parliamentary Rules: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=481875 because the mods warned me that the RP rule number 1 is invalid (you can find it in the description during the debate and the vote and after the passage into the debate board indicated as not valid and against the game rules): the players cannot be obbliged to vote and to respect the request of early elections if deseappear a party with more than 20% of seats.

But as Nationmaster, given the powers regnozide to me, I can efforce this policy.
For the articles 2 and 3 the mods say me that respect the game rules and that they can intervene to make respect it.

So, I ask you to vote again to this bill where the articles 2 and 3 will be now the new article 1 and 2:

RP Parliamentary rules' articles (OOC: the mods confirmed me that they are binding for the players):

1) It's compulsory for the members of Parliament (players) to enter in the title of each bill that are going to propose to the Parliament the following specifications:

1.a) "D.d.l." (Disegno di legge): if it is a government's initiative bill, and therefore proposed by the government (through the parties that support him in parliament) after approval by the Council of Ministers;

1.b) "P.d.l." (Proposta di legge): in case the bill is proposed by a member of parliament individually or from his political group (in the opposition or into the government's majority).

1.c) If a D.d.l bill don't have none of two entries listed under the paragraph 2.a) and 2.b), this is considered as if it were a P.d.l. (non-governmental bill).

1.d) Only exceptions are proposal to review, approval or annulment of a treaty drawn up or presented by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, a proposal for a review and/or approval of the budget drawn up by the Ministry of Finance, a bill to call early election.
(the players are not obliged to specify "P.d.l. or D.d.l." if a players creates a bill to ask or propose events for the developing of Role Play History or if it's a question or other arguments related with the game)

1.e) After the enter "P.d.l." or "D.d.l." the parties have to specify the progressive number(pn) of the bill for each years(yy) of the legislature in this form: pn/yy. P.d.l. and D.d.l. follow separate progression.

1.f) Examples: "P.d.l. 02/70 - Economic proposal", "D.d.l. 02/70 - State Intervention", "P.d.l. 03/70 - Marriage Act", "P.d.l. 05/71 - Media reforms Act", "D.d.l. 01/71 - Work Protection", etc....

* * * * * * * * *

2) The players, in the description of a bill that are about to propose or when they write a message under a bill, must use the form rules delineate in the paragraphs below :

2.a) an incipit where indicate who presents the bill or express a message (example: "the Minister of Foreign Affairs Mario Rossi", "the X Party's member Mario Rossi", "the X Party's whip (chief of the party in parliament) of the chamber of deputies Mario Rossi", "the Government....", ecc...).

2.b) than the text of the proposal, or the message under the bill (where the players can play a member of parliament).

2.c) the (players) members of the parliament have to use a language suitables for the legislative body (example: "honorables members of parliament", "we thanks the minister/party/member of parliament X for his intervention", "my party want present this bill because", "we, the X Party, conscious of..., we'll vote against...., we accept this proposal..., I do not endorse this bill... (if talks a single member individually it's possible use the first person), etc...).

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 635

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

    Random quote: "The best politics is right action." - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 31