Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:33:30
Server time: 15:26:29, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | Brazil25 | R Drax | Triguns7491 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Curriculum Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (보수당)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4179

Description[?]:

In order to ensure very school up and down are getting the same, fair education, the government should set a national curriculum on what needs to be taught and learnt by students in school.

This will ensure every school is getting fair education

Wouldn't you want your child to be taught subject that have the trust of the government to be taught?

Vote for this to be passed in order for every student to get the fair education they deserve set by the trusted government

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:44:08, March 11, 2017 CET
FromSocial Democrat Alliance
ToDebating the National Curriculum Act
MessageWe see the point Labour is making here, but we are concerned about something: religious, cultural and individual freedom. We feel that a National Curriculum is a step forward, but only if it's no obligation. We see more in the following revision:

There is a National Curriculum which is advisory only and is not binding on any schools.

That way, we have a approved National Curriculum which still alows space for minorities and religious communities to insert their own beliefs, courses and limitations. What does Labour think of this?

Date04:00:20, March 12, 2017 CET
FromRepublican Party - 공화당 (GHD)
ToDebating the National Curriculum Act
MessageMr Speaker,

The KLP is in favour of this legislation.

Chairman Je

Date12:52:23, March 12, 2017 CET
FromSocial Democrat Alliance
ToDebating the National Curriculum Act
MessageMr Speaker,

After another round of consultations with our voters, we sadly announce that we are against the Bill in this current format.

Date14:55:57, March 12, 2017 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the National Curriculum Act
MessageMr Speaker,

I quote from the bill description: "Wouldn't you want your child to be taught subject that have the trust of the government to be taught?"

To many people, the answer to that would be no, simply because parents have a much better idea about the talents and interests of their children and the kind of education they require in order to accomodate these. Why should a one-sitze-fits all government-imposed curriculum be superior to what we have now in the light of these considerations?

Mariano Lee Chong MLC
Minister of Education and Culture


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 11

no
   

Total Seats: 184

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "Someone who wields power in name only can never compete with those who wield it through action." - Franz Reichert, former Luthorian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55