We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Curriculum Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (보수당)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4179
Description[?]:
In order to ensure very school up and down are getting the same, fair education, the government should set a national curriculum on what needs to be taught and learnt by students in school. This will ensure every school is getting fair education Wouldn't you want your child to be taught subject that have the trust of the government to be taught? Vote for this to be passed in order for every student to get the fair education they deserve set by the trusted government |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National Curriculum
Old value:: There is no National Curriculum; the curriculum is set by the schools themselves.
Current: There is a National Curriculum which all schools are obliged to follow.
Proposed: There is a National Curriculum which all schools are obliged to follow.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:44:08, March 11, 2017 CET | From | Social Democrat Alliance | To | Debating the National Curriculum Act |
Message | We see the point Labour is making here, but we are concerned about something: religious, cultural and individual freedom. We feel that a National Curriculum is a step forward, but only if it's no obligation. We see more in the following revision: There is a National Curriculum which is advisory only and is not binding on any schools. That way, we have a approved National Curriculum which still alows space for minorities and religious communities to insert their own beliefs, courses and limitations. What does Labour think of this? |
Date | 04:00:20, March 12, 2017 CET | From | Republican Party - 공화당 (GHD) | To | Debating the National Curriculum Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, The KLP is in favour of this legislation. Chairman Je |
Date | 12:52:23, March 12, 2017 CET | From | Social Democrat Alliance | To | Debating the National Curriculum Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, After another round of consultations with our voters, we sadly announce that we are against the Bill in this current format. |
Date | 14:55:57, March 12, 2017 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the National Curriculum Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, I quote from the bill description: "Wouldn't you want your child to be taught subject that have the trust of the government to be taught?" To many people, the answer to that would be no, simply because parents have a much better idea about the talents and interests of their children and the kind of education they require in order to accomodate these. Why should a one-sitze-fits all government-imposed curriculum be superior to what we have now in the light of these considerations? Mariano Lee Chong MLC Minister of Education and Culture |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 11 | |||
no | Total Seats: 184 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "Someone who wields power in name only can never compete with those who wield it through action." - Franz Reichert, former Luthorian politician |