Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 01:52:12
Server time: 06:07:47, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberecana Unio

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4180

Description[?]:

Open for debate, this must pass for Zardugalo! However it is open for change. Let the free market do the cleaning for us and lets avoid the Tragedy of the Commons.

Marco Provo
President of Zardugalo and LU

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:00:53, March 12, 2017 CET
FromLiberecana Unio
ToDebating the Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179
MessageWe believe the current status quo is inadequate, therefore this bill would set things right.

Date17:45:12, March 12, 2017 CET
FromKonfederacio Nacia Laboro
ToDebating the Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179
MessageOOC: As I know that you are actually a "Libertarian" irl, you are aware that the "tragedy of the commons" can be disproven by simply agreeing on how to use said commons? The man who who wrote the thesis eventually even agreed that it was wrong!

Anyway, sorry for this, but I'm fine with people with different beliefs and such things, but the "tragedy of the Commons" is one of my political petpeeves.

Date23:49:42, March 12, 2017 CET
FromLiberecana Unio
ToDebating the Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179
MessageI am a Libertarian indeed, and therefore I strongly believe, that the private market simply handles things more efficiently, if people could make money, from selling forests, would they want to sell it all after 1 year, or sell forest for ever? If its government however, then it does not have direct interest in it, they are susceptible to lobbying and just want re election.

Date23:58:08, March 12, 2017 CET
FromKonfederacio Nacia Laboro
ToDebating the Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179
MessageOOC: are you IC or OOC right now dude

Date00:01:20, March 13, 2017 CET
FromLiberecana Unio
ToDebating the Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179
MessageOOC

Date00:02:31, March 13, 2017 CET
FromLiberecana Unio
ToDebating the Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179
MessageBut it would apply for IC as well (except where I talk about govt. not a single majority party would say that)

Date00:05:51, March 13, 2017 CET
FromKonfederacio Nacia Laboro
ToDebating the Ecology Amendments retry 05/4179
MessageOOC; Just make sure you add what you're in at the moment or it can cause some fairly hilarious confusion, lmao.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 315

no
 

Total Seats: 73

abstain
  

Total Seats: 112


Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved.

Random quote: "Law is mind without reason." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68