We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Recognition Bill of 4179
Details
Submitted by[?]: Luthori Right Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4181
Description[?]:
A bill to lessen tension created by religious offences. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change State penalties for blasphemy
Old value:: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Current: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Proposed: Local governments decide on penalties for blasphemy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:36:20, March 13, 2017 CET | From | Royalist Party | To | Debating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179 |
Message | Mr Speaker, We believe in a separation between church and state, therefore we cannot vote in favor of this bill. I yield, George Palmerston |
Date | 21:58:16, March 14, 2017 CET | From | Luthori Right Party | To | Debating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179 |
Message | Mr Speaker, As the separation of church and state pertains to creating a law that inhibits free practice of religion, this bill does not infringe upon that platform. This bill was created to simply ensure the free and fair practice of religions and create a check in the freedom of speech in order that the freedom of religion endure. I yield, ShakaZulu |
Date | 22:20:06, March 15, 2017 CET | From | Royalist Party | To | Debating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, It's a lie to say that this bill promotes the freedom of religion. I yield, George Palmerston |
Date | 01:27:10, March 16, 2017 CET | From | United Luthori | To | Debating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, What a reasonable proposal. I do believe the only people who have cause for worry are those who vote for the Liberal Democrats. Who knows what kinds of conversations, especially on the matter of religion, go on behind closed doors. To even think of the possibilities is a scandalous affair that is simply too taxing on the mind to dwell on for long. I yield. Rt Hon. Christopher Holt MD Prime Minister United Luthori (Sandulka Center) |
Date | 18:56:15, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Royalist Party | To | Debating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I get the idea that the Liberal Democrats need to correct something. We are not against religion, in fact many of our members are religious. We however do not think that religion can be forced upon anyone, unfortunately the Luthori Right Party, United Luthori and Hosian Nationalists Party of Nationalists disagree with me on that. We believe every individual can choose how their religion influences their personal lives, we disagree with a government that forces Hosian aspects upon your life(style). I yield, George Palmerston, Leader Liberal Democrats |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 277 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 247 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 126 |
Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller |