Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 01:13:00
Server time: 18:46:59, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): Augustus Zardus | Drax | hexaus18 | HopesFor | hyraemous | Neo_kami | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Recognition Bill of 4179

Details

Submitted by[?]: Luthori Right Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4181

Description[?]:

A bill to lessen tension created by religious offences.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:36:20, March 13, 2017 CET
FromRoyalist Party
ToDebating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179
MessageMr Speaker,

We believe in a separation between church and state, therefore we cannot vote in favor of this bill.

I yield,
George Palmerston

Date21:58:16, March 14, 2017 CET
FromLuthori Right Party
ToDebating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179
MessageMr Speaker,

As the separation of church and state pertains to creating a law that inhibits free practice of religion, this bill does not infringe upon that platform. This bill was created to simply ensure the free and fair practice of religions and create a check in the freedom of speech in order that the freedom of religion endure.

I yield,
ShakaZulu

Date22:20:06, March 15, 2017 CET
FromRoyalist Party
ToDebating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179
MessageMr. Speaker,

It's a lie to say that this bill promotes the freedom of religion.

I yield,
George Palmerston

Date01:27:10, March 16, 2017 CET
FromUnited Luthori
ToDebating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179
MessageMr. Speaker,

What a reasonable proposal. I do believe the only people who have cause for worry are those who vote for the Liberal Democrats. Who knows what kinds of conversations, especially on the matter of religion, go on behind closed doors. To even think of the possibilities is a scandalous affair that is simply too taxing on the mind to dwell on for long.

I yield.

Rt Hon. Christopher Holt MD
Prime Minister
United Luthori (Sandulka Center)

Date18:56:15, March 16, 2017 CET
FromRoyalist Party
ToDebating the Religious Recognition Bill of 4179
MessageMr. Speaker,

I get the idea that the Liberal Democrats need to correct something. We are not against religion, in fact many of our members are religious. We however do not think that religion can be forced upon anyone, unfortunately the Luthori Right Party, United Luthori and Hosian Nationalists Party of Nationalists disagree with me on that. We believe every individual can choose how their religion influences their personal lives, we disagree with a government that forces Hosian aspects upon your life(style).

I yield,
George Palmerston,
Leader Liberal Democrats

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 277

no
   

Total Seats: 247

abstain
 

Total Seats: 126


Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56