We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Abortion Funds Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hizb Rmady
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4182
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy of the government concerning the funding of abortions
Old value:: The government provides funding for abortions.
Current: The government provides funding for abortions.
Proposed: The government only funds abortions for medical emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:16:50, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Abortion Funds Bill |
Message | We will vote no because If a person can't afford an abortion they wouldn't be able to afford to raise a child and that's not what we want for our children |
Date | 21:28:15, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Hizb Rmady | To | Debating the Abortion Funds Bill |
Message | I would agree with you, but child benefit now extends to both low-income and large families. This should offset the cost of having children. |
Date | 02:52:55, March 17, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Abortion Funds Bill |
Message | yes but then you're just putting that burden on our taxpayers that have to pay those low-income and large families to raise more children. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 181 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 118 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 201 |
Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
Random quote: "If Lincoln were alive today, he’d be turning over in his grave." - Gerald Ford |