We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Firing Strikers Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hizb Rmady
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4182
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:23:55, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Bill |
| Message | What will be seen as a reasonable reason to strike |
| Date | 04:24:28, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Bill |
| Message | People will take advantage of this and strikers will not strike and conditions will be very poor |
| Date | 21:40:16, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Hizb Rmady | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Bill |
| Message | If workers go on strike for good reason, but have been fired, it will be illegal. Since it is illegal, it can be taken to court. As you pointed out, "reasonable reason" is somewhat ambiguous. This ambiguity will allow for more flexibility in deciding who is right: the employer or the employee. The government should not favor one over the other, and the law currently favors the employee. |
| Date | 01:18:07, March 17, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Bill |
| Message | your party seems to care more about those at the top than those at the bottom. We need to allow our people power because big businesses even with us being on no ones side have humongous power and we are giving them even more power with changing this. This doesn't make us neutral. Theres many ways to interpret reasonable reasons and businesses will have the power and money to shift that interpretation to their liking. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 218 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 81 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 201 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "There is no other definition of communism valid for us than that of the abolition of the exploitation of man by man." - Che Guevara |