We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Soil Security Act (SSA) of 2183
Details
Submitted by[?]: Malivianese Militarist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2184
Description[?]:
It is agreed that foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office. So ordered by the Assembly. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Current: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Proposed: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:53:16, February 09, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Soil Security Act (SSA) of 2183 |
Message | Support. Some foreign nations are so bad with human rights, or other reasons.. that we should not endorse their type of government or behaviors by allowing them an embassy here. |
Date | 01:26:16, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Meritocratic Progressive Union | To | Debating the Soil Security Act (SSA) of 2183 |
Message | Agreed. Establishing an embassy shouldn't be a right but more of a privelege. |
Date | 15:23:35, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Free Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Soil Security Act (SSA) of 2183 |
Message | Concur. Unregistered embassies may turn out to be bastions of intelligence gathering.... |
Date | 18:18:34, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Democrat League | To | Debating the Soil Security Act (SSA) of 2183 |
Message | We agree. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 196 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 103 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" - Ernest Gaines |