We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Law of War Act 4183
Details
Submitted by[?]: Civic Republican League of Rutania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4183
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons on non-civilian areas.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:17:02, March 19, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Law of War Act 4183 |
Message | The LPR would prefer an all out ban, but will support this bill as a step in the right direction. |
Date | 20:36:35, March 19, 2017 CET | From | Rutania Party | To | Debating the Law of War Act 4183 |
Message | Though with no seats at the moment the Rutania National Party would support the seconded half of the bill. |
Date | 20:55:49, March 19, 2017 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Law of War Act 4183 |
Message | This bill would weaken us nationally. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 98 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 131 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 21 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "The truly powerful feed ideology to the masses like fast food while they dine on the most rarified delicacy of all: impunity." - Naomi Klein |