We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, December 4183
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: August 4184
Description[?]:
We, the Labour Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:00:57, March 21, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | with all the speculation about the last election going around the best way to stop the speculation and rumors us to have another election. |
Date | 22:10:17, March 21, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | We have had 2 elections in 3 years we don't need another this soon, we will wait until 4186. |
Date | 22:10:31, March 21, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | Unless an emergency is needed. |
Date | 23:09:38, March 21, 2017 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | Although our party does believe that the rapid rate of new elections is unfortunate, this is the only way to ensure that corruption and fraud did not occur in the previous instance. |
Date | 23:13:28, March 21, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | We're if the same opinion,I don't like it but it's the only way. |
Date | 23:14:45, March 21, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | If the BRRP hadn't cheated then why would they say no to an early election, surely if they won without cheating they wouldn't be worried enough to vote against another election would they? |
Date | 23:36:52, March 21, 2017 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | Is there a part of your party that has a mentality that snap elections should be held every year? |
Date | 23:57:53, March 21, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | only when corrupt parties are in government. |
Date | 00:08:19, March 22, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 4183 |
Message | The Labour Party's previous statement makes no sense. The BRRP voting against the early election doesn't imply fear of defeat, it just means that the BRRP agrees with us at the UPB that too many elections in a short time span is too much. If we keep calling so many early elections they will loose there importance to the people as the government won't have time to get set up. -John Fredrickson, Chairman of the UPB, MC. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 379 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 371 |
Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
Random quote: "Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat." - Don Reagan |