We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2183
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2185
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Totalitarian Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Totalitarian Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the United Soviet Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Totalitarian Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Totalitarian Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the National Libertarian Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the United Soviet Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the National Libertarian Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Totalitarian Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the National Libertarian Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the National Libertarian Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Totalitarian Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the United Soviet Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:03:13, February 10, 2006 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2183 |
| Message | I get the feeling you don't like me. Was it the whole cigar/tobacco thing and the burning and the salting? ...or perhaps the 1 million euthanased retards? ...persecution of homosexuals? Oh, no wait, it was branding you with crosses and swastikas, wasn't it? No? Really, I don't think we can be friends if you can't be open with me. |
| Date | 22:52:37, February 11, 2006 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2183 |
| Message | Openness is for pussys. |
| Date | 23:56:02, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2183 |
| Message | I agree with the NLP! |
| Date | 00:00:48, February 12, 2006 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2183 |
| Message | we shouldnt be open but upon the bill..we disagree. |
| Date | 02:19:27, February 12, 2006 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2183 |
| Message | It was the swastika brands, wasn't it? |
| Date | 02:26:22, February 12, 2006 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2183 |
| Message | No wait, silly me. It was the whole throwing Barker Deeton II into the cooler, wasn't it? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 110 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 313 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |