We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill NLA-57 Freedom in the Defence Industries
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Democratic Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2184
Description[?]:
Revised draft of defence industry privatization bill presented before the Darnussian Senate by Senator Miranda Garneau and Senator James T. Gottlieb of the New Liberal Alliance: This act moves to reverse a previous bill passed recently by this auspicious Senate to create a national, state-owned and operated defence industry. It is important to present more economic freedom and encourage competition in order for companies to strive to advance technologies in order to receive a contract. This motion allows for many new ideas to arise which could also be used to better life in a civil and social context. A government-owned and operated defence industry will be too mammoth and provide directly for the government leaving other companies and their inventions from any chance to bring their innovations into being which affects civil technological advancement itself. The advancement and creation of the Internet, for example, started from a military program which went into civilian use. Not only will this allow for less need for money to be spent to maintain a large government institution with the sole purpose to manufacture arms, this money could instead be used for humanitarian and social programs instead of undertaking the burden of a rise and fall of a defence company owned entirely by the government. This measure will also counter-act "state capitalism", in which, essentially, the government becomes a company in itself instead of many private enterprise and ventures competing. We find that individual and private ventures to be the best for the advancement of the nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:03:33, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Socialist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Bill NLA-57 Freedom in the Defence Industries |
Message | No, I completely disagree. |
Date | 14:51:12, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Bill NLA-57 Freedom in the Defence Industries |
Message | The NLA, the Conservative Party |
Date | 00:08:54, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Bill NLA-57 Freedom in the Defence Industries |
Message | Well I'm sorry if I am not one to support the government using tax money to construct and create weapons used for killing across the world and leave it up to individuals. It is obvious the Democratic Socialist Party would rather we spend money on maintaining and constructing government-owned killing machines instead of using the people's hard-earned tax money on something that actually benefits them. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 175 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 250 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 125 |
Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in. |
Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi. |