We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Amendment
Details
Submitted by[?]: Algemeyner Yeudisher Arbeter Bund
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4189
Description[?]:
| This Amendment to the Constitution repeals the following section: "3. The military and police have the right to undertake steps to ensure the conservative nature of Beiteynu." It is ridiculous to enshrine any particular ideology in our Constitution, and even more dangerous to empower the military to remove democratically-elected governments, particularly under such a vague and amorphous standard. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:27:25, March 31, 2017 CET | From | תְּקוּמָה | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | OOC: Please take note of the next election. Bills which take place before the next election will be automatically moved in the debate section. Furthermore, RP-law changes have to be clearly described and outlined. For more see the rp rules in the forum. |
| Date | 10:45:36, March 31, 2017 CET | From | תְּקוּמָה | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | OOC: A different law was just struk down by the moderation: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=511092 for similiar reasons. |
| Date | 06:16:44, April 01, 2017 CET | From | Algemeyner Yeudisher Arbeter Bund | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | OOC: dude relax. We get it, you don't like competition, but your constitution is both poorly written and fundamentally not fun |
| Date | 10:34:11, April 01, 2017 CET | From | תְּקוּמָה | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | OOC: This proposal is clearly against the rules. Please familiraize yourself with the RP rules. |
| Date | 02:40:59, April 02, 2017 CET | From | Algemeyner Yeudisher Arbeter Bund | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | OOC: How is this proposal "clearly" against the rules. I have already "familiraized" myself with the RP rules plenty. Nothing in this is against the rules--your "constitutional amendments" can be changed by a 2/3 vote. Stop being so cranky that you don't always get your way. |
| Date | 09:39:54, April 02, 2017 CET | From | תְּקוּמָה | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | OOC: As you might have overread: The bill must be clearly specified as an rp bill. This has not happen. To vote in favour of it would mean to accept a clear breach of the rp rules. Anyway, this bill will not get 2/3-majority so indeed i get my way ;) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 323 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 299 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 77 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people." - Oscar Wilde |