We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Better Enviroment Act of 2183
Details
Submitted by[?]: AntiNeoCon Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2184
Description[?]:
A bill to better the enviroment of the Union of Quanzari Soviets. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Current: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Proposed: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Private companies are responsible for disposing of their own waste. The government disposes of residential waste.
Current: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector and is unregulated.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:58:20, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Socialist Ecology Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | You better leave the Ecological reforms to our party... |
Date | 17:30:23, February 11, 2006 CET | From | AntiNeoCon Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | i'd better not. totalitariansim is never right, besides, your voting record doesn't show one of environmentalism |
Date | 07:28:09, February 12, 2006 CET | From | Socialist Ecology Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | Are you kidding me... wow... go look at the bills I have put up in the past. The environmental reforms which are in place at the moment are only their because of the work of our party. And as far as the statement of my "totalitarianism" give me a break, I ended slavey and the mistreatment of POWs in this great nation. Before you attempt to insult this party, you had better get the facts right, oh and then you may learn some politics while you're at it. |
Date | 21:44:09, February 12, 2006 CET | From | AntiNeoCon Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | the complete control of ecological reform is a form of totalitarianism. on your political positions it says "Ecology - skeptic-leaning" as far as my limited knowledge goes, that's the opposite of environmentalism. |
Date | 23:47:17, February 12, 2006 CET | From | Socialist Ecology Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | I'm glad you understand what "skeptic" means. Like I have already stated, go look at the bills I have gotten passed. I have reformed Ecology to the way I want it to be, and no party has yet made an attempt to change it, so therefore, as I have done little with Ecology recently, the game assumes my party does not care anymore, when in actuality Ecology is just the way I want it at the moment. Seeing as you are a very new party, and not very good at politics, you would not know this. Just trust me, go look at the bills I have proposed, actually I believe the first bill I proposed was called the "Reformed Ecology Bill", and either for that bill or another one, another party called me a "hippie environmentalist". Now little AntiNeoCon Party, next time you feel my party is not upholding it\'s values, one- you should probably be more concerned with your party, and two- I'd really, really appreciate it if there was some bases behind your argument, that would make it some much more fulfilling to correct you. Good day to you. |
Date | 04:58:26, February 13, 2006 CET | From | AntiNeoCon Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | if the environment is the way you like it then you aren't an environmentalist at all. |
Date | 05:00:30, February 13, 2006 CET | From | AntiNeoCon Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | further more, no matter what you have done, no matter how comendable your former bills are, the environment can still improve, and having complete control of the environment given to one party is not safe at all. |
Date | 17:23:50, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Socialist Ecology Party | To | Debating the Better Enviroment Act of 2183 |
Message | Ok, this is just really ridiculous, your small mind must not be understanding. In the scope of this game, with it's proposals, I have reformed every Ecological proposal there is, I cannot physically change any more even if I tried, simply cause there aren't any to change. All I have left now to do is stop anyone who wants to change them, or if I feel the proposal is good, I may vote for it, it's really quite simple, of course for people of your intelligence I'm not so sure how simple it is. If there were more Ecological proposals I would change them to the way I like them, too bad there are limits to the game you know. By the way, you have the most ridiculous points for an argument ever. You know nothing about how this game works, just stop attempting to communicate with this party, I don't want my party to be infected by your stupid. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 76 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 433 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 241 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "The worst thing the bad guys can do is force us to doubt the good ones." - Viria Agelasta, former Selucian politician |