Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 00:30:35
Server time: 23:29:24, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | albaniansunited | LC73DunMHP | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: RP: proposal for regional government

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4193

Description[?]:

There have been a lot of attempts to RP local (state) governments and laws over the last couple of years, but they haven't caught on. Here's what I propose:

1. After each election, we look at the seats in state legislatures, and agree coalitions (which must have majorities) to govern each state. Once these have been agreed, we keep a bill in debate that lists the coalitions in power in each state.

2. Each coalition then agrees a series of laws to pass through the state legislatures they control. These are kept as proposals in bills-in-debate: e.g. there should be a bill called 'Laws in Kragusrov' which lists laws in force in Kragusrov.

3. States can ONLY legislate on matters devolved to them, e.g. if a state government wants policy on hunting and fishing to be "Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods", then the national law on hunting and fishing must be "The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments."

I think this could work really well, and create power struggles between state and federal governments.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:07:32, April 06, 2017 CET
FromCivic Republican League of Rutania
ToDebating the RP: proposal for regional government
MessageWe'd be on board.

Date02:12:35, April 06, 2017 CET
FromWhig Party
ToDebating the RP: proposal for regional government
MessageOOC: I'm on board, the RP will be fun.

Date03:50:16, April 06, 2017 CET
FromNew People's Party of Rutania
ToDebating the RP: proposal for regional government
MessageOOC: I'm in.

Date03:51:22, April 06, 2017 CET
FromNew People's Party of Rutania
ToDebating the RP: proposal for regional government
MessageOOC: Should we try and get a new Nationmaster? The Constitutional Affairs Committee has not been active for a long time.

Date05:40:13, April 06, 2017 CET
FromRutanian National Front
ToDebating the RP: proposal for regional government
MessageOOC: If we go this route, I think that a new Nationmaster is going to have to happen eventually. Between this and the other RP situations that are beginning to pick up, it's going to have to happen.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 441

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 59


    Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page.

    Random quote: "Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark." - Muammar Gaddafi-

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 56