We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic National Security Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Popular Action Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4195
Description[?]:
We will be in economic chaos if we keep allowing Kazulian communists to take over our strategic economic sectors. The Kazulians are well known for corruption as our foreign PM will not doubt attest that is why he left that hellhole. Han Dae Kim PAP Backbencher Chairman of the "Presidential Caucus" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign investments.
Old value:: Foreign investors may freely invest in national companies.
Current: Foreign investors may invest in national companies, but may not get a majority share.
Proposed: Foreign investors need to obtain government approval for all investments in national companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:32:10, April 11, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Economic National Security Act |
Message | Dear Mr Speaker, First of all, we are not communist and we would have tat in our name if we were. Second of all everyone knows your parties racist views will never get you very far! What you are doing is causing a money issue. We rely on some foreign investors to invest in companies so by making us approve them will make us look less attractive to invest and see a decrease in the amount of money we have available to make important decisions. Diane Jones Foreign Minister |
Date | 20:34:58, April 11, 2017 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Economic National Security Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, what has happened here is regrettable, but is in no ways the fault of genuine free trade but of distortive intervention by the Kazulian government. We will propose a ban on monopolies as a remedy, and urge our coalition partners to vote no on this Ri-ordered folly, which would result in the kind of collectivization the President has hypocritically accused us of pursuing. Lynne Trevellian MLC Trade and Industry Minister |
Date | 20:37:13, April 11, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Economic National Security Act |
Message | Dear Lynne Trevellian, We will happily vote no on this bill Diane Jones Foreign Affairs Minister |
Date | 08:25:30, April 12, 2017 CET | From | Popular Action Party | To | Debating the Economic National Security Act |
Message | OOC: Darn collective voting mechanics, well the PAP is split, roughly three fifths vote yes and two fifths voting no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 86 | |||
no | Total Seats: 149 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 20 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all the people." - Noam Chomsky |