Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 03:25:54
Server time: 04:34:05, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Arusu-Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economic National Security Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Popular Action Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4195

Description[?]:

We will be in economic chaos if we keep allowing Kazulian communists to take over our strategic economic sectors. The Kazulians are well known for corruption as our foreign PM will not doubt attest that is why he left that hellhole.


Han Dae Kim
PAP Backbencher
Chairman of the "Presidential Caucus"

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:32:10, April 11, 2017 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the Economic National Security Act
MessageDear Mr Speaker,
First of all, we are not communist and we would have tat in our name if we were. Second of all everyone knows your parties racist views will never get you very far!

What you are doing is causing a money issue. We rely on some foreign investors to invest in companies so by making us approve them will make us look less attractive to invest and see a decrease in the amount of money we have available to make important decisions.

Diane Jones
Foreign Minister

Date20:34:58, April 11, 2017 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Economic National Security Act
MessageMr Speaker,

what has happened here is regrettable, but is in no ways the fault of genuine free trade but of distortive intervention by the Kazulian government. We will propose a ban on monopolies as a remedy, and urge our coalition partners to vote no on this Ri-ordered folly, which would result in the kind of collectivization the President has hypocritically accused us of pursuing.

Lynne Trevellian MLC
Trade and Industry Minister

Date20:37:13, April 11, 2017 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the Economic National Security Act
MessageDear Lynne Trevellian,
We will happily vote no on this bill

Diane Jones
Foreign Affairs Minister

Date08:25:30, April 12, 2017 CET
FromPopular Action Party
ToDebating the Economic National Security Act
MessageOOC: Darn collective voting mechanics, well the PAP is split, roughly three fifths vote yes and two fifths voting no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 86

no
   

Total Seats: 149

abstain
  

Total Seats: 20


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all the people." - Noam Chomsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55