Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 01:47:10
Server time: 18:12:49, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | Paulo Nogueira | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Bill C-27: Reintroduction of the Local Defence Act of 4105

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Hutori

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4231

Description[?]:

Article I.) Upon Passage of this Bill individual Provinces will have the right to create, organize and equip their own military forces known as "Provincial Militias."
Article II.) Provincial Militias will be commanded by the Premier and any Provincial Minister appointed to oversee them while the Provincial governments will be responsible for the equipment and maintenence and any PM units they create.
Article III.) Any and all Provincial Militias units created under this Law are subject to Federal Ministry of Defence Oversight and are to be considered apart of the Armed Forces Reserve.
Article IV.) All Provinical Militia units automatically fall under Command of the Federal Ministry of Defence during times of war or national emergency.
Article V.) Provincial Militias units are restricted from being any larger then a Army "Division".
Article VI.) Provincial Militias Naval or Air Force Units are strictly prohibited.
Article VII.) No Provincial Militia Officer may hold a rank higher then that of Major General.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:30:59, April 12, 2017 CET
From Liberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Bill C-27: Reintroduction of the Local Defence Act of 4105
MessageMr. Speaker

We open this Bill for Debate and encourage our colleagues in the Hutorian Proletarian Party to seek is out directly knowing that they will not debate in this Chamber.

Ryan DeCoste
Senator for Port Prosperity Docks
Minister of Defence

Date07:18:18, April 13, 2017 CET
FromNational Progress Party
ToDebating the Bill C-27: Reintroduction of the Local Defence Act of 4105
Message''Mr. Speaker

I really don't understand what the minister of Defence is trying to accomplish here. How is this bill supposed to make us stronger? How is dividing our army like that is supposed to make us more powerfull?

I can understand that some people support giving more power to local goverment. But I sincerely believe that giving to province the control over a part of our army is a really bad idea. It can only make us weaker''

-Sofia Wright
Senator and former minister of Defence

Date20:49:57, April 16, 2017 CET
From Liberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Bill C-27: Reintroduction of the Local Defence Act of 4105
MessageMr. Speaker

This doesn't divided the Army nor give provinces control over any portion of the Army. It gives the provinces the ability to raise and train their own Defence Militias which aid us in shouldering the costs of maintaining our military; I'll note to the Honourable Senate we have recently gone through an 11 bn HLR cut to Defence which requires us to make adjustments to accommodate and this cut was done with the assumption that National Guards or Provincal Militias were legal.

This will measure will empower the provinces while at the same time allowing our nation's ability to defend itself.

Ryan DeCoste
Minister of Defence

Date05:19:34, April 17, 2017 CET
FromNational Progress Party
ToDebating the Bill C-27: Reintroduction of the Local Defence Act of 4105
Message''Mr. Speaker

First of all I would like to point out to the honorable minister of Defence that the eleven billions HRL that have been cut from the ministry of Defense were not done with the assumption that Provincal Militias were legal. In fact, these cuts were made because of the promise of that Federalist party had made many years ago during the creation of the Hutorian Coast Guard. For more information about this you can look at the ''Bill: F-42: Hutorian Coast Guard Creation Act''
(http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=496196)

But, what the mister DeCoste doesn't seem to understand is that his reasoning is completly flawed. He's saying that provincial millitia will aid us in shouldering the costs of maintaining our military. But when you think about it, this bill won't reduce the cost of our military, it will only change which government will pay our military.
At the end, the taxpayer will pay the exact same amount for our military.

So, I reiterate my questions toward the Minister of Defence. How is this bill supposed to make us stronger? What good will this bill do?''

-Sofia Wright
Senator and former minister of Defence

Date10:52:03, June 24, 2017 CET
From Moderation
ToDebating the Bill C-27: Reintroduction of the Local Defence Act of 4105
MessageOOC: Moved to vote for purposes of archiving.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 334

no
  

Total Seats: 112

abstain
  

Total Seats: 154


Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

Random quote: "The Revolution needs to progress. We as humans need to evolve into higher beings through better moral virtues. And we can achieve that if we clean ourselves from the immoral. Those who go against the Revolution, go against human progress and must be freed in the most humane way possible. That is why we introduced the guillotine." - Maximus Robertson, former Davostani revolutionary

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 51