We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Independent Wood Production Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4196
Description[?]:
Limiting felling to fire breaks may prevent necessary quotas of wood from being reached, whereas a set amount can be guaranteed through licenses. Restrictions need to be set to prevent too many trees from being taken down at once, but we want to maximize our wood production instead of relying on imports to make up the difference. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:52:41, April 13, 2017 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Independent Wood Production Act |
Message | We also currently have a law that ensures that any trees cut down will be replaced with at least two new seedlings. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 186 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 346 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 218 |
Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
Random quote: "[In the West] unpopular ideas can be silenced, and inconvenient facts kept dark, without any need for an official ban." - George Orwell |