We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Speaker of the Reichstag
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konservative Unionistische Partei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4197
Description[?]:
| Esteemed Members of the Reichstag, Our parliament is grand, great and respected across the globe, we wish for this to continue for the foreseeable future. The Konservative Partei believe that a "Speaker of the Reichstag" should be put in place to control and fairly distribute debate in the Reichsatg, to ensure order. I propose the motion a "Speaker of the Reichstag" is introduced. That is the proposed motion. If the motion passes, at a later date the process of election will be discussed. Gaul Pruner MR Independent Conservative Member |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:07:54, April 17, 2017 CET | From |   Ordnungsfraktion | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: Seriously dude, we already have that. How dense are you? |
| Date | 11:09:24, April 17, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Unionistische Partei | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: How is the current elected? Where are members made aware of this position? This is to simply affirm that postion which has faded out of the Reichstag and its politics! |
| Date | 11:10:13, April 17, 2017 CET | From | Ordnungsfraktion | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=497879 here you go |
| Date | 11:16:18, April 17, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Unionistische Partei | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: As you will see that was passed almost 40 years before our founding. As I previously said this is reaffirming that position giving parties an opportunity to share their views on this. |
| Date | 11:17:07, April 17, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Unionistische Partei | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: Also I do not appreciate you referring to me as "dense." It is incredibly rude and demeaning. |
| Date | 11:18:00, April 17, 2017 CET | From | Ordnungsfraktion | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: The Liberal Party managed to notice it and your original intention was to establish one, dont try to cover up that you were just not able to notice the bill before creating this one. |
| Date | 11:20:15, April 17, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Unionistische Partei | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: The Liberal Party will be aware of this, because they have held the position. I admit, I did not see the former bill as it is in German. |
| Date | 11:27:03, April 17, 2017 CET | From | Ordnungsfraktion | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC: So you are not able to see other languages? Interesting. How do you write your Party name then? |
| Date | 19:58:48, April 17, 2017 CET | From |   Moderation | To | Debating the Speaker of the Reichstag |
| Message | OOC; Hello Mbites,, please be civil to sconstantine. No need to call the player "dense" because you disagree with a bill proposal he made. Regards, Reddy (Moderation) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 282 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 32 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 45 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "How we can possibly be giving £1bn a month, when we're in this sort of debt, to Bongo Bongo Land is completely beyond me." - Godfrey Bloom |