We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religion Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Habonim Dror
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2186
Description[?]:
| For article 2: kippahs will be required. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: People are required to dress according to religious codes
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Current: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Proposed: There is an official state religion, and membership is mandatory.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:48:05, February 12, 2006 CET | From | United Beiteynu Party | To | Debating the Religion Act |
| Message | Against. I am for a ultra-capitalist, ultra-libertarian, ultra-the-poor-are-lazy-bums, and secular Beiteynu. |
| Date | 03:12:31, February 12, 2006 CET | From | Judean People's Front | To | Debating the Religion Act |
| Message | All for, only because I am CRAZY!!!! |
| Date | 03:13:10, February 12, 2006 CET | From | Judean People's Front | To | Debating the Religion Act |
| Message | Also, societies need a stong religious structure in order to perpetuate a morally decent sense of morality. |
| Date | 22:37:54, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Jewish Right Progressive Party | To | Debating the Religion Act |
| Message | Because that's been proven with religious states like most of the Middle East. *rolls eyes* |
| Date | 02:47:28, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Habonim Dror | To | Debating the Religion Act |
| Message | What is this "middle east" you speak of? |
| Date | 01:33:08, February 15, 2006 CET | From | United Beiteynu Party | To | Debating the Religion Act |
| Message | Where is NFP?! If this passes, whatever, I don't even know what to say... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 231 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 195 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 54 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "If a white man falls off a chair drunk, it's just a drunk. If a Negro does, it's the whole damn Negro race." - Bill Cosby |