We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Population directive 1 - Not So Green
Details
Submitted by[?]: Likaton Fascist Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2185
Description[?]:
| A recent poll conducted have shown that a large portion of our countrymen like environmental controls, however they feel that they are currently somewhat restrictive. The people have spoken on this issue: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewnews.php?newsid=35696&nation=17 The AM PSS now proposes to put the peoples will into the form of legislation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:53:03, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Population directive 1 - Not So Green |
| Message | The AM AAP realises that the AM SLP is actually listening directly to the constituents here, and that is making us lean somewhat in favour of the proposal... but we are wary about relaxing industrial pollution control... even IF the citizens prefer it... because, once our environment is ruined, that's it... we don't get another. |
| Date | 02:17:47, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Population directive 1 - Not So Green |
| Message | We understand the AM AAP sentiments here, however we are not asking for an unbridled assault on the environment. There is some thing to be said for acting in the long term guardianship of a natural national resource, and if the feeling was more towards removing all legislation then we would have to consider our position in much the same light as the AAP is currently. As it stands, it's not too drastic and if the the people so will it, in future we would be happy to consider a change back to tougher laws. It is a small shift in laws to accommodate the will of the people, therefore we shall proceed with the proposal. |
| Date | 02:35:05, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Population directive 1 - Not So Green |
| Message | AM AAP is going to have to break ranks with the rest of the Axis Mundi on this issue. We respect the opinions and reasoning of our coalition allies, but we feel we must be the ecological 'hardline' of the group. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 277 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 185 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 38 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "When we're unemployed, we're called lazy; when the whites are unemployed it's called a depression." - Jesse Jackson |