We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grüne Demokratische Partei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4203
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP). If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:12:29, April 29, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Allianz für Freiheit | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP) |
| Message | Speaker, It is a good initiative, but we believe that the objectives of this Union are too vague in order for it to be the base of a country's economic policy. " The right balance between economic growth and regulation"? Could you slightly specify these goals? Mark Hagen |
| Date | 01:23:28, April 29, 2017 CET | From | Soziale Nationalistische Partei | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP) |
| Message | Herr Deputies, Despite the proposal by our coalition partner, this is an ill-fated organization which we cannot agree to. The failure of a defined structure, its impacts on sovereignty and about a dozen other issues flag-up when I read this proposed "International Union". We've got several dozen treaties and treaty organizations dedicated to the preservation of our economy, let us use those then senselessly proposing new ones. Vinitharius von und zu Gießen, SNP Federal Assembly Leader |
| Date | 11:18:56, April 29, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP) |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I don't think any other party is getting this proposal whatsoever. The point of this treaty isn't to be a union like the AU, but instead to be an accord which pushes countries to economic sensibility. How on earth does it infringe on our sovereignty? There are no articles to this bill. And we will only work with other nations to protect jobs and companies from being lost.l Elise Harig Minister of Foreign Affairs Leader of the Pragmatic Party |
| Date | 00:33:59, April 30, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Allianz für Freiheit | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP) |
| Message | Speaker, Maybe I'd rather want it to be like the AU. At least that's less vague. Mark Hagen |
| Date | 11:49:31, April 30, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Union for Economic Protection (IUEP) |
| Message | Mr Speaker, That compromises national sovereignty. Elise Harig Minister of Foreign Affairs Leader of the Pragmatic Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 70 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 435 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag |