We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Employer & Strikes Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito Democratico Progressista - F.P
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4204
Description[?]:
| X |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:45:44, May 01, 2017 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Employer & Strikes Act |
| Message | OOC: Please, respect the parliamentary rules about the presentation of a bill (binding rules). http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=481875 1) It's compulsory for the members of Parliament (players) to enter in the title of each bill that are going to propose to the Parliament the following specifications: 1.a) "D.d.l." (Disegno di legge): if it is a government's initiative bill, and therefore proposed by the government (through the parties that support him in parliament) after approval by the Council of Ministers; 1.b) "P.d.l." (Proposta di legge): in case the bill is proposed by a member of parliament individually or from his political group (in the opposition or into the government's majority). 1.c) If a D.d.l bill don't have none of two entries listed under the paragraph 1.a) and 1.b), this is considered as if it were a P.d.l. (non-governmental bill). 1.d) Only exceptions are proposal to review, approval or annulment of a treaty drawn up or presented by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, a proposal for a review and/or approval of the budget drawn up by the Ministry of Finance, a bill to call early election. (the players are not obliged to specify "P.d.l. or D.d.l." if a players creates a bill to ask or propose events for the developing of Role Play History or if it's a question or other arguments related with the game) 1.e) After the enter "P.d.l." or "D.d.l." the parties have to specify the progressive number(pn) of the bill for each years(yy) of the legislature in this form: pn/yy. P.d.l. and D.d.l. follow separate progression. 1.f) Examples: "P.d.l. 02/70 - Economic proposal", "D.d.l. 02/70 - State Intervention", "P.d.l. 03/70 - Marriage Act", "P.d.l. 05/71 - Media reforms Act", "D.d.l. 01/71 - Work Protection", etc.... 2) The players, in the description of a bill that are about to propose or when they write a message under a bill, must use the form rules delineate in the paragraphs below : 2.a) an incipit where indicate who presents the bill or express a message (example: "the Minister of Foreign Affairs Mario Rossi", "the X Party's member Mario Rossi", "the X Party's whip (chief of the party in parliament) of the chamber of deputies Mario Rossi", "the Government....", ecc...). 2.b) than the text of the proposal, or the message under the bill (where the players can play a member of parliament). 2.c) the (players) members of the parliament have to use a language suitables for the legislative body (example: "honorables members of parliament", "we thanks the minister/party/member of parliament X for his intervention", "my party want present this bill because", "we, the X Party, conscious of..., we'll vote against...., we accept this proposal..., I do not endorse this bill... (if talks a single member individually it's possible use the first person), etc...). |
| Date | 02:01:02, May 01, 2017 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Employer & Strikes Act |
| Message | Camilla Fiorenti, Leader of LP: "who will define what is a reasonable reasons? This changement will put the employers in too much advantageous position toward the employees. And given the fact that approve a strike the Unions need of the favorable vote of more than half of the associated to go in strike, this already avoid unreasonable reasons." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 200 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 435 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates." - Gore Vidal |