We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Debate Post by liberal Anarchists
Details
Submitted by[?]: Jakanian Conservatives
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2185
Description[?]:
| i think all should have the right to retire @ 55!vote yes and vote for your counry! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 65
Proposed: 55
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:45:09, February 13, 2006 CET | From |  Jakanian Conservatives | To | Debating the Debate Post by liberal Anarchists |
| Message | look people work there butts off and for nothing ! if u feel tired at 55 vote for us ! we need more rights in our country . now! |
| Date | 10:21:01, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian-Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Debate Post by liberal Anarchists |
| Message | We already voted on a bill similar to this. The gist of the "no" debate went something like: "We shouldn't force people to retire if they still want to work. Anyway, early retirees will cost far too much for our pension and health systems to cover." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 141 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 109 |
| Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
| Random quote: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Carlos Hank Gonzalez |