We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Free-ports and Trade Laissez-Faire Act.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nacia Konservativa Partio
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4210
Description[?]:
| The Free ports of Gatineo, Sebastino and Kostandian Bay are hereby ruled by a juridic system benefiting the business and investment activities. Residents of the free port are granted some privileges: light taxation, simplified customs and visa procedures, facilitated administration procedures. *Facilitated visa regime (possibility to get a 8-days visa at the border); *Modern and fast system of border crossing for international business; *Lowered taxes on income for investors (instead of the usual 20%, 5% during the first 5 years, then 12% during the following 5 years); *Creation of a free zone, with possibility of storage for luxury articles, works of art and antiques, to prepare them for sale and sowing to potential buyers. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation does not impose any tariffs or quotas on imports.
Current: The nation allows for imports, but imposes "ethical" tariffs on nations with lower environmental and labour rights standards.
Proposed: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 400 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The spirit of democracy is not a mechanical thing to be adjusted by abolition of forms. It requires change of heart." - Mahatma Gandhi |