We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nobility titles Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Wind of Change
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4214
Description[?]:
| All the people must have the same rights and privileges and these nobility titles break this rule. This bill forbids them and would hinder their acquisition if they were approved. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Titles of nobility.
Old value:: Titles of nobility may be granted only by the Head of State.
Current: No titles of nobility are granted or recognised, their use is forbidden.
Proposed: No titles of nobility are granted or recognised, their use is forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:18:51, May 15, 2017 CET | From | Unity Labour Party | To | Debating the Nobility titles Bill |
| Message | How on one hand you make a proposal to outlaw titles of nobility while also proposing nobility titles and minor rights? |
| Date | 23:35:15, May 15, 2017 CET | From | Wind of Change | To | Debating the Nobility titles Bill |
| Message | The second article is made to hinder their acquisition if they were reactivated as I say in the description. |
| Date | 13:56:58, May 16, 2017 CET | From | Unity Labour Party | To | Debating the Nobility titles Bill |
| Message | I don't think you get what I'm saying. What I see in this bill is where for example on one hand you outlaw sale of guns but on the other hand you recognize gun ownership. The first proposal forbids the granting of nobility titles but the second proposal actually encourages nobility titles as it confers titles and minor political rights onto nobles. If you forbid something, it cannot be approved. |
| Date | 01:55:07, May 17, 2017 CET | From | Cosmopolitan Party | To | Debating the Nobility titles Bill |
| Message | I'd agree with the second article, but I think there is some value in keeping minor titles, so I won't support the first article. And, agreeing with the Unity Labour Party, the second article can't exist if the first change is made; titles can't grant any rights if they are not possible to attain. |
| Date | 16:57:34, May 17, 2017 CET | From | Wind of Change | To | Debating the Nobility titles Bill |
| Message | So, we will eliminate article one. |
| Date | 23:34:11, May 19, 2017 CET | From | Fatherland Front | To | Debating the Nobility titles Bill |
| Message | Winds I support this so can you put it to vote!? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 243 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 124 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
| Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
| Random quote: "The state is nothing but an instrument of oppression of one class by another, no less so in a democratic republic than in a monarchy." - John Smith |