We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reforme Gouvernementale
Details
Submitted by[?]: Les Conservateurs
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4213
Description[?]:
| Nous les Deputés du Parti Conservateur voulons accentuer linportance du gouvernement |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of the viewing of movies.
Old value:: The viewing of movies is not regulated by the government.
Current: The government sets a range of standards (to be determined) and these apply to cinemas and private homes.
Proposed: The government sets a range of standards (to be determined) but these only apply to movie theaters.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Art subsidies
Old value:: The government subsidises artistic institutions such as art schools and galleries, but does not subsidise individual artists.
Current: The government subsidises artistic institutions and some artists on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government subsidises artistic institutions and some artists on a case by case basis.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Protection of original works of technology and arts.
Old value:: Works of techology and art have limited copy protection.
Current: Works of technology and art are protected by copyright.
Proposed: Works of technology and art are protected by copyright.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Current: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Proposed: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector but is regulated.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Current: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Proposed: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on a salary cap.
Old value:: The government has no stance on a salary cap.
Current: The government enforces a salary cap.
Proposed: The government enforces a salary cap.
Article 9
Proposal[?] to change Government law concerning the sales of recreational drugs.
Old value:: Recreational drugs sales are handled by private foundations which are heavily regulated by the government.
Current: The government is entirely responsible for the controlled sales of recreational drugs through operating stores and other locations.
Proposed: The government is entirely responsible for the controlled sales of recreational drugs through operating stores and other locations.
Article 10
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of video games.
Old value:: The government does not regulate video games.
Current: The government does not maintain laws as to age limitation for purchasing video games, although it does require a content rating to be clearly displayed on the box.
Proposed: The government maintains strict age limitation laws that require proof of age before sales of video games may be made.
Article 11
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: The state guarantees child benefit to both low-income families and large families.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Article 12
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Article 13
Proposal[?] to change Listing of controversial ingredients, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (if food labelling is applied).
Old value:: There is no requirement to disclose GM ingredients, or chemicals used in agrigulture or processing.
Current: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Proposed: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Article 14
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government supplies free pharmaceutical drugs to those on low incomes.
Current: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Proposed: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:56:23, May 18, 2017 CET | From | Parti Progressiste | To | Debating the Reforme Gouvernementale |
| Message | Our party believes that these changes are too socialist. Many of your proposals take entire industries of the private sector. Ones which there is no reason to. I could be behind the policy on private cars, but currently the vote is a no. |
| Date | 08:11:13, May 18, 2017 CET | From | Reconstruire l'ancien (RA) | To | Debating the Reforme Gouvernementale |
| Message | We also believe that this is simply an overwhelming change in government, one we couldn't handle. We could perhaps agree on a few Articles, but as it goes, we have to vote no. |
| Date | 15:24:37, May 18, 2017 CET | From | Le Parti Socialiste Travailliste | To | Debating the Reforme Gouvernementale |
| Message | Le Parti Conservateur, as a socialist party, i one-hundred percent support these changes, i vote yes, even though many may not support it, we, Le Parti Socialiste Démocratique, do. |
| Date | 16:22:29, May 18, 2017 CET | From | Les Conservateurs | To | Debating the Reforme Gouvernementale |
| Message | Le Parti Conservateur wants to imperatively pass these bills because the country has long been abuse by excessive amount of unregulated businesses we need to fight for the poor. |
| Date | 20:06:56, May 18, 2017 CET | From | Le Parti Socialiste Travailliste | To | Debating the Reforme Gouvernementale |
| Message | Exactly, we need to reform this government according to these laws. |
| Date | 20:30:54, May 18, 2017 CET | From | Reconstruire l'ancien (RA) | To | Debating the Reforme Gouvernementale |
| Message | I am surprised to see such a socialist proposal from a "Parti Conservateur". Did you skip politics class, if so, we offer great classes thanks to our education reform. |
| Date | 21:29:14, May 18, 2017 CET | From | Les Conservateurs | To | Debating the Reforme Gouvernementale |
| Message | You will find that it only takes 20 years for a liberal to becone conservative |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 324 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 422 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 4 |
| Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
| Random quote: "Mine is the first generation able to contemplate the possibility that we may live our entire lives without going to war or sending our children to war." - Tony Blair |