Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5471
Next month in: 00:35:50
Server time: 03:24:09, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Fuel Bill of September 2185

Details

Submitted by[?]: Dynex Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2186

Description[?]:

To make our economy more competitive

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:28:16, February 14, 2006 CET
From Dynex Party
ToDebating the Fuel Bill of September 2185
MessageIt is crazy to ONLY allow enviromentally friendly fuels. We simply do not have enough enviromentally friendly fuels available. This is hurting our country more than it is helping the enviroment. We need to give people the option of what type of fuels to use. Tax incentives will encourage enviromentally friendly fuels, but wouldn't prohibit the use of other fuels.

Date14:43:01, February 14, 2006 CET
From United Worker's Party
ToDebating the Fuel Bill of September 2185
Messagewe support this

Date15:55:27, February 14, 2006 CET
From Omega Party
ToDebating the Fuel Bill of September 2185
MessageAs this bill has been in place for many years, would it not be safe to assume that these environmentally friendly cars are already in production?

Date21:58:53, February 14, 2006 CET
From Socialists Fury
ToDebating the Fuel Bill of September 2185
Messagehave you ever heard of vegetable oil???? I'm sure we have enough restaurants and dining places in this land of jelbania to feed all 4 of our cities....

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 203

no
    

Total Seats: 298

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60