We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fuel Bill of September 2185
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dynex Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2186
Description[?]:
To make our economy more competitive |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Current: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Proposed: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:28:16, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Dynex Party | To | Debating the Fuel Bill of September 2185 |
Message | It is crazy to ONLY allow enviromentally friendly fuels. We simply do not have enough enviromentally friendly fuels available. This is hurting our country more than it is helping the enviroment. We need to give people the option of what type of fuels to use. Tax incentives will encourage enviromentally friendly fuels, but wouldn't prohibit the use of other fuels. |
Date | 14:43:01, February 14, 2006 CET | From | United Worker's Party | To | Debating the Fuel Bill of September 2185 |
Message | we support this |
Date | 15:55:27, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Omega Party | To | Debating the Fuel Bill of September 2185 |
Message | As this bill has been in place for many years, would it not be safe to assume that these environmentally friendly cars are already in production? |
Date | 21:58:53, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Socialists Fury | To | Debating the Fuel Bill of September 2185 |
Message | have you ever heard of vegetable oil???? I'm sure we have enough restaurants and dining places in this land of jelbania to feed all 4 of our cities.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 203 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 298 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |