Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 4460
Next month in: 01:02:48
Server time: 14:57:11, September 25, 2018 CET
Currently online (8): Bacchus | dannypk2 | Erlingland | lulus | Menkiller780 | Orege | tom1234 | Ugandaviking | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: LGBT Rights Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4222

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:07:41, June 04, 2017 CET
FromHosian Civic Union
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageThis is ludicrous!!!!!

As if allowing fluidity of genders was not bad enough we now have to fund it!!

Needless to say: We oppose.

Date00:24:46, June 05, 2017 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageThat's why the UPP only has 28 seats. Extremist.

Date17:27:08, June 05, 2017 CET
FromGaduridos First Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

The RDP should remember when they party he serves in hit an all time low.

Rebecca Gore
Leader of the GFP

Date17:56:06, June 05, 2017 CET
FromHosian Civic Union
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageFortunately being rather grown-up the members of the UPP can bear with the RDP's mad leftist moanings. Apparently by engaging in a feud with us they will increase their support.

Magno Ruelas
UPP Caucus Leader

Date21:13:34, June 05, 2017 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageTo the UPP: We are not the left. We are not the right. We wont waste time with extremist parties that arent even the leader of the opposition.

To the GFP: Call us when you reach 44% of the vote like we did in 4178.

Date22:01:23, June 05, 2017 CET
FromGo Gaduridos! [PAG]
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageThere would need to be clear regulations put in place so a person can't just change his gender to tree or something just because he feels like it.

Date22:06:28, June 05, 2017 CET
FromHosian Civic Union
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageAnd then decide that he will start taking part in womens' wrestling events and wow guess what?! Who would have thought it? S/he starts to win!!

To the RDP: Why did you suddenly plunge to an even lower % of the vote in the election immediately after 4178? I suspect you rigged the one in 4178 because it was a very out of the ordinary result... It would be just like the devious left to do that. Yes that's right: LEFT. You know, those lower class chaps who swing out of back alleys to vote and then live on benefits - 'coming from the streets' to quote your party description.

OOC: Please dont take this personally! It's all strictly in-game!

Date00:54:31, June 08, 2017 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageTo UPP: It worked! Thanks for making the RDP a bigger party.

Date00:56:02, June 08, 2017 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageBy the way, what is 'left'? We are the people.

Date00:57:38, June 08, 2017 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageOCC: Of course, I know :-D

Date04:02:09, June 08, 2017 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageTo the UPP: The RDP did not rig the 4178 elections. Most RDP voters voted SDP in 4182. The lying right always accuses the left because they always lose, and can't accept it. We will win 4226, and you can't stop us.

OOC: This is also in game.

Date01:57:01, June 10, 2017 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageAlso, why did we suddenly lose more than half of our seats in 4214, then got them back the next election? It looks like most of the NSP voters voted for the GFP and the GRP the next election, so why did we lose those seats? We believe the Conservative Alliance has rigged that election to benefit their ally, the NSP, and attempted to make it look normal by also taking a few seats away from the GFP.

Date09:53:34, June 10, 2017 CET
FromHosian Civic Union
ToDebating the LGBT Rights Act
MessageOf course yes! That would make perfect sense! Never mind the fact that voters do sometimes tend to change their minds a little.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 252

no
     

Total Seats: 249

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

    Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" Larry Hardiman

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 79