Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 02:10:49
Server time: 05:49:10, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economics Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Red Star Movement

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2188

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:58:43, February 18, 2006 CET
From Communist Party of Saridan
ToDebating the Economics Bill
MessageThumbs up.

Date14:45:16, February 18, 2006 CET
From Jacobin Society
ToDebating the Economics Bill
MessageHow does this help the economy?

Date14:50:13, February 18, 2006 CET
From Jacobin Society
ToDebating the Economics Bill
MessageWe do, however, support the first and last measures. Why are we raising taxes anywhere when people are un-employed?

Date19:41:27, February 18, 2006 CET
From Roman Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Economics Bill
MessageYou are doing nothing but hampering the growth of our nation and increasing the poor in the country!

Date03:31:51, February 19, 2006 CET
From Party for the Promotion of Pandas
ToDebating the Economics Bill
Messagei like it but whwy the child labour when the child labour is already what yur asking?

Date12:48:58, February 19, 2006 CET
From New Daio Party
ToDebating the Economics Bill
Message::laughs his ass off::

You see those unemployment figures? Prepare for them to go up. WAY up. You're saying:

ARTICLE 1: Teenagers can't get summer jobs. Go look up the original bill.

Article 2: Corporations, now, instead of hiring people and expanding, now have to downsize dramatically and lay people off. Because you've just increased their tax burden 3000%. Which, by the by, will only yield you about... oh say 150 billion... for a few months. Then expect it to drop dramatically as businesses stop making very much money at all. Oh, and might I also add, that's going to take the CCI into a nosedive, drop investments even further, and probably cut somewhere around half a trillion off the GDP, initially. Which means everyone's salaries are also going to dive and welfare is going to need a whole lot more funding. Oh, and tax revenues from sales taxes? Toilet.

Article 3: You just fired an ENTIRE industry and you now have to provide all the money to keep it running (see trade and industry funding to do that) and since they're all working for the state now, good luck getting them to work for the same salary, especially since they're unionized and will strike if you try to drop them, and will probably threaten to strike if you keep them the same or raise them via layoffs. Yay, more unemployment!

Article 4: Aww, the one feel-good part of the bill. Now that there are so many more people in the poorhouse, this should make life easier on them, right?

This bill is a JOKE. You have no grasp of how economics works in the least.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 180

no
  

Total Seats: 59

abstain
  

Total Seats: 46


Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/

Random quote: "I came, I saw, I conquered" - Julius Caesar

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76