We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Gaduridos
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4224
Description[?]:
| A bill to regain the confidence of the entrepreneurs to our government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 8
Current: 25
Proposed: 10
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Positive discrimination.
Old value:: No form of positive discrimination is permitted.
Current: No form of positive discrimination is permitted.
Proposed: The government does not regulate hiring policies.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 60
Proposed: 60
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:42:59, June 09, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | By raising taxes and lowering the retirement age? That's socialist! |
| Date | 14:59:14, June 09, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Gaduridos | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | Reducing the retirement age by five years is to give the younger people more opportunity to find jobs and for the elders to be able to receive their benefits earlier. We also intend to increase the tax by two percent to let the small businesses to compete against them in local levels. Please rethink the decision. |
| Date | 15:10:13, June 09, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | But the increase in tax applies to small businesses too. |
| Date | 15:17:18, June 09, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Gaduridos | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | It only applies to registered corporations. Local small market enterprises is not affected by the tax increase. |
| Date | 17:41:22, June 09, 2017 CET | From | Gaduridos First Party | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Right Party has time and again given up government in a coalition because his members believed it would shift our group to the left, this party went to the left on its own. Stephanie Williams Leader of the GFP |
| Date | 17:45:34, June 09, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Gaduridos | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | Ms Willams, That move you speak of is the choice of our previous leader, Abbondio Gesualdo. He explained to us that the sole reason of that move is that he was disappointed by the coalition's struggle to be the majority. We will never go to left. Our vision and principles are to stay right as much as possible. Please consider your vote. Viliberto Battista Leader of the GRP |
| Date | 21:02:38, June 09, 2017 CET | From | Go Gaduridos! [PAG] | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | Higher taxes? Legalized discrimination? Was the goal of this bill to get as many no votes as possible? |
| Date | 10:01:22, June 10, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Gaduridos | To | Debating the Entrepreneurs Confidence Bill |
| Message | The goal is to let small market enterprises compete against corporations for a much more competitive economy across all the business sectors. We also have to give the entrepreneurs the rights to hire whoever they want. M: My first article proposition is what's being used by almost all countries irl -_- |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 87 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 414 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." - Winston Churchill |