We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Legislation size
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Party of Endralon
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4224
Description[?]:
We beleive that 25 representatives per state is way too less. It was a mistake by all three parties to do that. 1 MP represents 800.000 constituants - that is just unaccaptable. Thevocie of the people will not be heard. If we didn't know better we would think that this was deliberately done to demage the democratic values of our nation. We are suprised that both Socialist parties voted for this change. OOC: size of the legislation has no other effect of the game - but with four parties we need more members. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 125
Current: 199
Proposed: 505
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:48:20, June 09, 2017 CET | From | People's Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Legislation size |
Message | Scenario 1 - with 125 members (25 per state): a party receives 10% of the votes in a state - thus gains 2 or 3 seats (OOC: I'm nt sure which), either way not 10% Scenario 2 - with 505 members (101 per state): a party receives 10% of the votes in a state - thus gains 10 seats, ie 10% of the state seats. Which one is fair? |
Date | 10:18:08, June 10, 2017 CET | From | Green Socialists | To | Debating the Legislation size |
Message | I actually forgot that Endralon had that many inhabitants. :) |
Date | 18:29:04, June 10, 2017 CET | From | People's Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Legislation size |
Message | It is sad to see that the KPR is deliberately against fair representation. Our ministers are resigning effective immediately. |
Date | 18:31:28, June 10, 2017 CET | From | People's Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Legislation size |
Message | OOC: No really, what is the reason behind 125? I am honestly curious. |
Date | 21:51:03, June 10, 2017 CET | From | People's Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Legislation size |
Message | Important: we should vote down an early election (if proposed) until this bill passes, ie November this year, otherwise this will not come into effect and we will end up with a 125 seat legislation. |
Date | 03:30:16, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Non-Partisan Movement | To | Debating the Legislation size |
Message | OOC The reasoning was just to make it a smaller number, and to cut the costs of government |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 392 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 188 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
Random quote: "I envy you. You North Americans are very lucky. You are fighting the most important fight of all, you live in the heart of the beast." - Che Guevara |