We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2186
Details
Submitted by[?]: DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2187
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Patriot Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Social-Conservative party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the One Nation Socialist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Social-Conservative party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Rightist Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the One Nation Socialist Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the One Nation Socialist Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Patriot Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Rightist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:22:56, February 15, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2186 |
| Message | We'll support the measure |
| Date | 21:53:13, February 15, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2186 |
| Message | We see no need to have a government so weak as this one 299 seats out of 299 would have ministers, and we have here parties whom can't work together whatsoever. This would just end up in a government of nothing more then total anarchy. And therefore we oppose. |
| Date | 22:03:54, February 15, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2186 |
| Message | 'SCP - this would lead to cooperation and communication between parties. What is wrong with that?' - Archbishop Friar |
| Date | 01:04:06, February 16, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2186 |
| Message | We'll support the measure |
| Date | 12:51:49, February 16, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2186 |
| Message | we thank the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party for trying to form a conscensus government and assure them there is nothing wrong with doing so. However the issue of co-operation is being tackled through the question time proposal and we feel that at the current moment in time the proposed government would end up either being very weak or making no effect with the same alliances between parties tearing the government apart from the inside. In a more ideal Tukarali we would support. |
| Date | 16:56:04, February 16, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2186 |
| Message | (OOC: I know you do not like Real Life conclusions, but i just post this so you intellectuals out there knows basic argument. "Polish Government") :) IC: We do not feel that a coalition government are nessesary nor desirable. We do co-operate, it is not so that the governmental parties follows the party line at all times, sometime they go up against the reign party, and have another decision coming through with the aid of opposing parties. So we see no reason to change this. This would only tare the government and nation apart from within. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 189 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 110 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "There are people in the world so hungry that God cannot appear to them except in the form of bread." - Mahatma Gandhi |