Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5470
Next month in: 02:56:21
Server time: 09:03:38, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partito Ambientalista Socialista Istalia

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4225

Description[?]:

OOC: Given the fact that the impeachment is an RP event, the players need to vote in favor this RP authorization bill to officially authorize it.
In fact, if this bill will pass, the players will act as if the President is removed and the its place taken by the current Prime Minister who will act in RP to form a Government (as provides by the Constitution).
This bill will approve officially an RP and if will pass all the players should adeguate their roleplay to it. If someone decide to not respect the RP (because they can also ignore the RP and the Constitution, which is an agreement between players but it is not binding) they cannot act against it as part of the Roleplaty itself and they will be simply ignored, as well as their RP activity, both into the game and into the forum.

It is not good to put all the players against a single player, but on the other hand, as there seems to be no motivation for the RP previously announced by CC, it is not even right that a player:
1. Prevent other players from playing even though the same game mechanics have been in their favor,
2. But above all, since in any case with the current parliament any law of PASI-NS-PDI would pass, similar behavior put at risk the realism of the game, which provides, in RP, a clear constitution.

We accept in RP the unleash of an institutional crisis, it is something that revitalize the gameplay, but everyone has had the opportunity to play and become a part of a government recently, so, this RP should be develop in respect of the will of all the players, so this RP authorization bill is simply a form of justice.

In case one or more of the parties involved into the Government will become inactive, in this case the, given the fact that no more majority would be recognized, the players are invited to call early elections.
Even this bill, like the previous one, has to pass by 2/3 of the votes in favor.

Thank you.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:45:21, June 12, 2017 CET
FromNuova Unione
ToDebating the OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill
MessageWait, what happened to the AI person?

Date18:50:46, June 12, 2017 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill
MessageOOC: Inactivated by mods for some reason. Maybe the use of a proxi connection of a browser to do not show the IP?


Date18:59:48, June 12, 2017 CET
FromNuova Unione
ToDebating the OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill
MessageOOC: It's because they used VPN. I got messaged. Also, I have a question: is Paolo or Paulo the correct form? At first I thought that it's the prior, but as I wasn't sure, I checked it and it was the latter. After some time, a guy called Paolo with an "o" appeared on TV, so Idk.

Date19:22:58, June 12, 2017 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill
MessageOOC: in italian, and so in istalian, the correct form is "Paolo". Paulo I think is used in portuguese countries.

Date08:49:03, June 13, 2017 CET
From Moderation
ToDebating the OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill
MessageOOC: Hello,

This RP law is void due to the following part.

"If someone decide to not respect the RP (because they can also ignore the RP and the Constitution, which is an agreement between players but it is not binding) they cannot act against it as part of the Roleplaty itself and they will be simply ignored, as well as their RP activity, both into the game and into the forum."

Player can in the case of voluntary conventions which they do not agree to, refuse to abide by them. Axxell, please do not incite players to persecute or shun other players. As Nationmaster of Istalia, it is vital that you act neutrally towards all players. You will need to retract that statement and pass a new RP law. You should also not mislead players with regards to the rules and operation of the Game Rules, particularly conventions.

For misleading players about the Game Rules and inciting them to shun or persecute other players, Moderation is issuing you with a warning and you are removed from your position as Nationmaster.


Regards,

Reddy
(Moderation)

Date09:57:04, June 13, 2017 CET
FromPartito Ambientalista Socialista Istalia
ToDebating the OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill
MessageOOC: So a player can ignore the constitution, block the game of another 4 players, and nothing has to be done?

Date10:38:11, June 13, 2017 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the OOC: "RP Impeachment" authorization bill
MessageOOC: the only thing to do is to go to early elections and give satisfation to the only one that block the gameplay. This is the politics here!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 530

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

    Random quote: "The truth is that men are tired of liberty." - Benito Mussolini

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58