Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 00:53:35
Server time: 23:06:24, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Moderation | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Administration Regulation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Unity Labour Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4227

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:33:32, June 14, 2017 CET
FromCentral Unionist Party
ToDebating the Administration Regulation Act
MessageGambling should not be made legal in private homes. Too many have been affected by those with Gambling addictions, I have seen houses being repossessed due to this addiction. We need to be able to ring fence gambling and keep it purely in licensed casinos, opening this up to a wider audience will only hurt the people.

Date18:37:07, June 14, 2017 CET
FromUnity Labour Party
ToDebating the Administration Regulation Act
MessageTo avert this issue, they will only be granted with license? Mr Speaker the excuse that limiting it to license casinos doesn't really say much as perosns from those same homes may we'll go to the casino and gamble which will affect them either way.
What we are saying is that it makes better sense economically to charge private homes to gamble and also to regulate these homes in gambling so as to tackle the issue of addiction while at same time gaining revenue for the state.

Date18:50:33, June 14, 2017 CET
FromCentral Unionist Party
ToDebating the Administration Regulation Act
MessageThe issue we have Mr Speaker, is that we are allowing additional places like regulated homes to host Gambling. Making it easier for the public to access. It may help the country economically, but it will tarnish the people.

Date19:03:07, June 14, 2017 CET
FromUnity Labour Party
ToDebating the Administration Regulation Act
MessageMr Speaker, what this party bus saying, even if we don't legalize it within the homes, the very persons from the homes can go to a casino and gamble . Thus, we believe that one can curb this behavior by making them pay to gamble which,because of added cost they may refrain from and if they do, the state will make more money and the Economy y will grow.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 194

no
   

Total Seats: 133

abstain
  

Total Seats: 123


Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation.

Random quote: "When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it." - Clarence Darrow

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55