We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administration Regulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unity Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4227
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Licensing of food sales.
Old value:: The licensing of food sale is left for local governments to decide.
Current: Food may be sold by licensed vendors only, and shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Proposed: Food may be sold by licensed vendors only.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Gambling is illegal unless taking place in a licensed casino.
Current: Gambling is legal, but only in private homes and casinos with special licences.
Proposed: Gambling is legal, but only in private homes and casinos with special licences.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:33:32, June 14, 2017 CET | From | Central Unionist Party | To | Debating the Administration Regulation Act |
Message | Gambling should not be made legal in private homes. Too many have been affected by those with Gambling addictions, I have seen houses being repossessed due to this addiction. We need to be able to ring fence gambling and keep it purely in licensed casinos, opening this up to a wider audience will only hurt the people. |
Date | 18:37:07, June 14, 2017 CET | From | Unity Labour Party | To | Debating the Administration Regulation Act |
Message | To avert this issue, they will only be granted with license? Mr Speaker the excuse that limiting it to license casinos doesn't really say much as perosns from those same homes may we'll go to the casino and gamble which will affect them either way. What we are saying is that it makes better sense economically to charge private homes to gamble and also to regulate these homes in gambling so as to tackle the issue of addiction while at same time gaining revenue for the state. |
Date | 18:50:33, June 14, 2017 CET | From | Central Unionist Party | To | Debating the Administration Regulation Act |
Message | The issue we have Mr Speaker, is that we are allowing additional places like regulated homes to host Gambling. Making it easier for the public to access. It may help the country economically, but it will tarnish the people. |
Date | 19:03:07, June 14, 2017 CET | From | Unity Labour Party | To | Debating the Administration Regulation Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, what this party bus saying, even if we don't legalize it within the homes, the very persons from the homes can go to a casino and gamble . Thus, we believe that one can curb this behavior by making them pay to gamble which,because of added cost they may refrain from and if they do, the state will make more money and the Economy y will grow. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 194 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 133 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 123 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
Random quote: "When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it." - Clarence Darrow |