Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 01:28:30
Server time: 18:31:29, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Investigation Findings

Details

Submitted by[?]: White Rose

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4227

Description[?]:

The Inquiry into Government statements from 4221 is complete...http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=522754

The findings are:

-The Socialist Government were not involved in the release of either statement.
-The office of then President, Mary Peters, released the statement.
-Who wrote the statements themselves remains unknown.
-Mary Peters was aware of the statements prior to release, and did nothing, effectively sanctioning their release.
-The Party of Patriots knowingly tried to deceive the House.

We do therefore present the following:

'That this House condemns Mary Peters and issues an official censure against her. Recognising that they abused her office and the will of the voters, the Party of Patriots are officially reprimanded for abuse of power.'

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:09:13, June 16, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Investigation Findings
MessageMr Speaker,
Who conducted this investigation? Why weren't we asked to give our story? Where other parties invited to the process or is it as many suspect an RCP conspiracy against our party and former President Mary Peters. Is this an attempt to dent confidence in the office of the President to get the monarchy back? Was the Socialist former government parties contacted? If not why not? Why have they vanished from the face of the earth at the exact time these statements were made.

This investigation is a shame, lead by a corrupt power hungry RCP party.

Party Spokesman

Date10:54:12, June 16, 2017 CET
FromLuthori Ironguard
ToDebating the Investigation Findings
MessageMr Speaker,
There are too many questions raised by the Party of Patriots to accept these findings. These questions would need to be answered to gain our acknowledgement

Mark Levane

Date23:32:32, June 16, 2017 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Investigation Findings
MessageMr Speaker,

Who conducted this investigation? The Luthori Civil Service.

Why weren't we asked to give our story? You aready gave your story as a Party when the investigation was launched.

Where other parties invited to the process or is it as many suspect an RCP conspiracy against our party and former President Mary Peters? It was not a party political process, it was a process authorised by the Government and undertaken by the civil service.

Is this an attempt to dent confidence in the office of the President to get the monarchy back? No, since members of the Government come from Republican parties as well as Royalist ones. The inquiry is into statements made by the previous Government.

Was the Socialist former government parties contacted? Their Ministers and Leader, Tommy Madden, were, yes.

Why have they vanished from the face of the earth at the exact time these statements were made? The inquiry was not interested in their decision to step away from the national stage, they began winding down operations months before the statements.

James Stinson
Foreign Secretary
Deputy Leader of the RCP

Date02:34:01, June 17, 2017 CET
FromLuthori Ironguard
ToDebating the Investigation Findings
MessageMr Speaker,

With the questions answered we will proceed to change our vote to yes

Mark Levane
Luthori Ironguard

Date06:22:22, June 17, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Investigation Findings
MessageMr Speaker,

We reject everything stated by the RCP. All complete lies and biased from the outset. It is also a complete lie that they spoke to Tommy Madden and the socialist party. The RCP are a corrupt power hungry pack of dogs. This is our final discussion on the matter.

Peter Wright
MP

Date06:36:15, June 17, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Investigation Findings
MessageMr Speaker,

One final item we forgot to discuss is the constitution which states the following:

Appointments and requirements for government employees.

Government employees are selected and appointed in a political way.

This clearly shows a bias and means that this "investigation" was flawed from the outset.

We urge all parties to reject this attempt to smear our party.

Date15:42:17, June 17, 2017 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Investigation Findings
MessageMr Speaker,

The House has had enough of the lies from the Party of Patriots. They could have admitted an employee of the Presidents office did this and apologise, instead they continue to lie, insult and deny. It is truly pathetic.

The Civil Service remains largely comprised of those the PP appointed in their 23 years and only some appointed by the entire Coalition, not solely the RCP.

James Stinson
Foreign Secretary
Deputy Leader of the RCP

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 179

no
  

Total Seats: 75

abstain
    

Total Seats: 89


Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

Random quote: "The only place where democracy comes before work is in the dictionary." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53