Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5471
Next month in: 00:32:02
Server time: 07:27:57, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | jamescfm-sol | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Six Party Coalition

Details

Submitted by[?]: Vereinigte Bewegung der Regionen

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4227

Description[?]:

Mrs President,

The VBR and PU have had fresh discussions about their recent dispute and my party concluded that the sky has been cleared. The VBR is confident that these meetings will lead to a new constructive relationship between both parties. This being said, there is sufficient common ground for a coalition as proposed before. ( http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=524046 ).

I do hope that all parties involved will support this.

Thank you,

Heinz Bauer
Partyleader

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:00:15, June 16, 2017 CET
From Sozialdemokratische Arbeitsfront (SDA)
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

So the VBR decides to work with the PU without discussing with us first? We thought we were constructive partner's already but that is not the case it seems.

Konstantin Klee,
Secretary General of the SDA

Date14:07:55, June 16, 2017 CET
From Vereinigte Bewegung der Regionen
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessageMrs President,

Indeed, relations between the PU and my party has been improved. but to us that does not have to mean that this should harm ours.

Heinz Bauer
Partyleader

Date14:21:11, June 16, 2017 CET
From Dorvische Allianz für Freiheit
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

It is ridiculous that an independent party like the VBR should consult any other party before it takes a move. The VBR is not a communist puppet.

Mark Hagen
DAF Leader

Date16:24:40, June 16, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

It's actually been in the news that our relations were mended:
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=353&p=116564#p116539

And obviously each party should have autonomy from any other.

Emely Kruspe
Leader of the Pragmatic Union

Date17:43:13, June 16, 2017 CET
From Sozialdemokratische Arbeitsfront (SDA)
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

It is not that we want to control any party. That idea is complete idiocracy. We want to be informed. Our party and the VBR where negotiating a coalition that could benefit the nation. When the PU introduced the vompromise cabinet of LGV and NA. WE voted in favor of that in the name of stability. But with our party and the VBR negotiating coalitions we expected to be at least informed if the VBR decided to create a cabinet without us.

And this new coalition proposal is just of out of porportions. 6 party's?! What do you want? The government to fail once again in 2 years? These party's ideology is totally different from each other. I suggest party's to vote against and to keep support for the LGV NA government.

Konstantin Klee,
Secretary General of the SDA

Date17:56:45, June 16, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

What was your genious coalition then? If you've ruled out us, the HDU, the NA and the KP, how could you form a government?

Emely Kruspe
Leader of the Pragmatic Union

Date20:34:46, June 16, 2017 CET
From Sozialdemokratische Arbeitsfront (SDA)
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

First of all we didnt rule out the HDU and KP. We would just rather not cooperate with them in a coalition because of to big differences in idealogical positions which would lead to yet another unstable government. And as we said the VBR and our party where DISCUSSING possibility's for cabinets but that stopped after the compromise of a LGV and NA government. Why change a newly installed administration so fast and at the same time create a six party coalition which will for sure lead to a unstable government that will AGAIN fall before its term ends.

The only thing we are saying is that a six party coalition with different ideology's is a recipe for disaster and we see no need to remove the LGV,NA government at such short notice.

Konstantin Klee,
Secretary General of the SDA

Date20:38:04, June 16, 2017 CET
From Sozialdemokratische Arbeitsfront (SDA)
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

We correct ourselves after seeing the compromise didnt pass but still keep our core message as legitimate.

Konstantin Klee,
Secretary General of the SDA

Date20:39:34, June 16, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

The LGV chose to not vote on that, and it failed before this was created.

Emely Kruspe
Leader of the Pragmatic Union

Date23:24:27, June 16, 2017 CET
From Fortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessagePresident,

A sensible coalition which we endorse; we are glad to see our least preferable of all the parties to us not included here.

Steffen Ross, Leader of the Progress Party

Date04:00:49, June 17, 2017 CET
From Freie Demokratische Union
ToDebating the Six Party Coalition
MessageMr. Speaker,

Me and my Party would like to take this opportunity to rule out any coalition with the SDA considering they are Radical Communists and there will be no scope for a Conservative Party like ours to work with Them.We are,at the same time happy that Fascists have also been kept at bay.

Thank You,
Clara Schauble,
Conservative Party Leader And Foreign Affairs Minister

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 254

no
  

Total Seats: 136

abstain
 

Total Seats: 115


Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

Random quote: "Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man." - Stewart Udall

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 77