Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 03:38:50
Server time: 04:21:09, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Likatonia looks outwards

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Fascist Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2187

Description[?]:

In the interests of fostering international co-operation, the AM PSS proposes the following.

We feel that Likatonia is becoming more accepted by the world community again, and as such we should be allowing our citizens to travel freely as well as citizens from other countries should be free to enter the country and spend their hard earned cash.

As far as quotas go, they ultimately distort the market and should be discouraged. Let us lead the way and unilaterally remove them.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:33:14, February 16, 2006 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Likatonia looks outwards
MessageAll except articles 1 & 4 are fine by us.

While we believe in the spirit of articles 1 & 4, it is a slight security risk simply because it is a way of allowing in nations without checking first. 4 is a problem because there is also a chance that there could be a fugative on the run from the law seeking asylum within our borders.

Date16:56:33, February 16, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Likatonia looks outwards
MessageArticle 1 - YES all the way

Articles 2 & 4 - In a perfect world, yes; but we feel that the security risks outway the cost of moderate security checking.

Article 3 - the existance of reciprocal tariffs can keep other nations from imposing tarrifs on our goods, therefore we feel that this should remain.

In balance, therefore, we must oppose this bill.

Date17:30:16, February 16, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Likatonia looks outwards
MessageWe feel articles 2 and 4 are risky... but we support articles 1 and 3. On balance, AM AAP may support.

Date11:56:31, February 17, 2006 CET
FromLikaton Fascist Front
ToDebating the Likatonia looks outwards
MessageWe shall remove article 4 in deference to the Axis Mundi.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 334

no
   

Total Seats: 166

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English.

    Random quote: "Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err." - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70