Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 00:45:06
Server time: 11:14:53, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Dioskouros | Temitayo | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partito Nazionale Democratico

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4231

Description[?]:

Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri Beniamino Massa

We need this. We have recently cut spending by a mile, we have to respond accordingly. I would also like to drop taxes, but I cannot do it if we have all of thise unnecessary government intervention and welfare state.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:13:12, June 23, 2017 CET
FromNuova Unione
ToDebating the P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure
MessagePaolo Conti, MSI chairman

"We must say, we cannot support this article. We see it as possibly damaging for our countries workers. Articles 2 to 8 are just contradicting our program. Though we would support the rest. We suggest splitting the article into two, one with articles 2-8 which we cannot and will not support and one with articles 1 and 9-16, which we would fully support if not for articles 10 and 11."

Date22:51:15, June 23, 2017 CET
FromPartito Nazionale Democratico
ToDebating the P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure
MessagePresidente del Consiglio dei Ministri Beniamino Massa,

Point taken, we shall split it in two.

Date09:59:39, June 24, 2017 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure
MessageNicola Gasbarro, Leader of LP:

"Despite we didn't support the article about the Union, closed and open shop (OOC: why capitalist party should vote in favor for an option clearly in favor of the unions?) and we didn't support several article about the minimum wage and minumum income, we will vote in favore.
We are aimed to change again the legislation.

Just a think: could the "sindacalista" movement explain why a party which in theory said to work for the workers is so ready to decrease their income? Sindacalista = Unione Trader, so, or you should change your name or you should rethink very well on what your party is.


Date10:07:07, June 24, 2017 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure
Message*we want also change the article about the compensation: how could be fair that between the part A and the part B, only the part A decides the right amount of compensation? (then profiting of long legal procedures which should undertake the part B)?

Date12:49:25, June 24, 2017 CET
FromNuova Unione
ToDebating the P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure
MessagePaolo Conti, MSI chairman

"Well, we discussed that and we, the Syndicalist movement wanted the party to be called the "Unity Labour Movement" but unfortunately the other leaders decided that the party should be calrd after the movement with the majority.
We believe that the current state of the issue could potentially lead to acts of sexism. Additionally, changing it will force the unemployment rate to fall drastically. We believe that having a job isn't a right, but should be compulsory. Why should some of our citizens work for the rest? For each their own."

Date20:08:10, June 24, 2017 CET
FromPartito dei Democratici Istaliani
ToDebating the P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure
MessageLuca Cecconi, GS of PDI:
"We will support to approve more rights on strikes, but we do not agree on majority of the bill"

Date21:18:45, June 24, 2017 CET
FromPartito Nazionale Democratico
ToDebating the P.d.l 12/4230 Economics, Welfare and Infrastructure
MessageBeniamino Massa,

We support unions to protect our workers where the government can not intervene, as long as those unions are voluntary, I do not even see it condradicting with capitalism if its a group of people enjoying collective bargaining and common legal protections, especially now where their lawyers are not provided by the state.

Minimum income and minimum wage are on the other hand are wealth redistribution, which we dont agree with.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 462

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
 

Total Seats: 50


Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way.

Random quote: "The worst thing the bad guys can do is force us to doubt the good ones." - Viria Agelasta, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 108