We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sdps morality laws 1
Details
Submitted by[?]: De Democratische socialistische partj
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4232
Description[?]:
Sdps moral law |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Homeless shelters and reintegration projects
Old value:: There is no government policy concerning homeless shelters and reintegration projects.
Current: There are government-run shelters, but these coexist with privately run shelters.
Proposed: There are government-run shelters, but these coexist with privately run shelters.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Guarantee of minimum income.
Old value:: All adults not supported by another person shall be guaranteed a very basic subsistence income by the government. However, the provision of this is not to exceed a certian period of time.
Current: All adults not supported by another person shall be guaranteed a very basic subsistence income by the government. However, the provision of this is not to exceed a certian period of time.
Proposed: All adults not supported by another person shall be guaranteed a very basic subsistence income by the government.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Current: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Proposed: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state offers a voluntary public pension, combined with other voluntary private pensions.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:29:35, June 24, 2017 CET | From | Trzykrnadrkjogadsrlji Bltmojad | To | Debating the Sdps morality laws 1 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Articles 3 and 4 are unacceptable for the Crown Party. Article 3 would be anti-Ahmadi oppression. The Ahmadi religion holds over 30% of our population and as we all know Ahmadi's are polygamous, men can have up to three wives. To make this illegal would break up a lot of Ahmadi families and simply discriminate against the Ahmadi people in our nation! How can the DSP promote DISCRIMINATION? As for article 4, our pension system is working perfectly, no need to force things on people. Let them have choice. |
Date | 01:55:30, June 25, 2017 CET | From | De Democratische socialistische partj | To | Debating the Sdps morality laws 1 |
Message | Mr Speaker The action i ask of removing the cur of polygomy from or fair state is not to alianate the ahmadi religion, but to incorperate those boy and men ostracised by societies acceptance of this act, at the moment polygomy leave 10% of the population without a hope of happiness, and this disenfranchised populus that asks to be heard. As for article 3 it is of the sdps opinion that the workers that have worked there lives to make this state great, should be looked after, and the current system offers to many opportunities for our worker who have since retired to fall in to poverty, the sdp cannot cannot stand idly be and let this occur |
Date | 17:46:58, June 25, 2017 CET | From | Trzykrnadrkjogadsrlji Bltmojad | To | Debating the Sdps morality laws 1 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, How does allowing religious men to marry according to their faith leave 10% unhappy?.. this is idiotic. |
Date | 22:25:23, June 25, 2017 CET | From | De Democratische socialistische partj | To | Debating the Sdps morality laws 1 |
Message | Mr speaker What is idiotic about the idea that 50% of the population is male and 50% female, how does 1 go in to 2, without 50% of the male poulation being left out, this is 7.5% of the general ahmadi population, to add to that our numbers indicate a 15% veiw in the female ahmedi populous that they are against the idea of polygomy . This is not idiotic it is basic maths, and if the kroon partj is to scared to make the big decisions in the advancement of this nation, the SDP will |
Date | 15:53:13, June 26, 2017 CET | From | Trzykrnadrkjogadsrlji Bltmojad | To | Debating the Sdps morality laws 1 |
Message | Mr Speaker, This is not basic maths, this is basic idiocracy. Not everyone marries. Just because there are men and women it does not mean they will marry. We also have homosexuals, asexuals and transexuals. There goes your basic maths! But we will oppose this filthy anti-Ahmadi law until infinity. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
no | Total Seats: 178 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
Random quote: "A leader has the vision and conviction that a dream can be achieved. He inspires the power and energy to get it done." - Ralph Nader |