We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill NP-89: Nationalisation of post office agency
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Progress Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4234
Description[?]:
| (This bill was proposed bi the minister of Finance Frederick Mulroney) This bill seek to completely nationalised the post office system. With a completely nationalized post system, we will be able to increase the revenue of the government. We will also be able to make the government more effective because the government will be able to use the HP to send it's own governmental letters to the population. Provision; Article 1) A new governmentally own post agancy will be created, this agency will be called Hutori Post (HP) Article 2) Hutori Post will have a complete monopoly of the post office industry. Article 3) Hutori Post will be controleded by the ministry of Finance Article 4) Even if the Hutori Post will have a monopoly on the post office industry, private delivery companies will still be allowed. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are regulated.
Current: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency in the nation. Private ones are banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:23:28, June 29, 2017 CET | From |  Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Bill NP-89: Nationalisation of post office agency |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Why ban private post services? It's possible for the government to create Hutori Post without completely cutting out the highly capable and effective private postal companies. If this is purely about government revenue then this is just another example of government greed and overreach. Mitchell Court Conservative Senate Leader Senator for Sutton |
| Date | 17:20:37, June 29, 2017 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Bill NP-89: Nationalisation of post office agency |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The fact of the matter is that private post agencies are more efficient than anything the government can achieve. Also monopolies are NEVER good even or perhaps especially when they are controlled by the government. They lead to inflated prices, reduced quality of service, lower employment rates and lower overall economic growth. Let's not green light government intrusion into private industry. Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader Leader of the Opposition |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 371 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 229 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Did you know you can change the official name of your nation? All you need to do is draw up a new name that is in accordance with the Nation Renaming Guide, pass a bill proposing the name change with a two-thirds majority and then post a request to Moderation on the "Renaming Requests" thread. You can change city and region names in this way too. |
| Random quote: "The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government." - Ayn Rand |