Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 01:08:16
Server time: 06:51:43, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ameerali | Ost | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty

Details

Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2191

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:49:41, February 17, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty
Messagewhat are peoples thoughts on this?

Date20:34:29, February 17, 2006 CET
FromDaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty
Message'It's far too vague, to the point that it is unworkable. For example,

'Capital punishment may be imposed only when the guilt of the person charged is based upon clear and convincing evidence'
'Capital punishment may only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court'

Things like these essentially mean nothing in the eyes of the law. No court is going to consider itself incompetent. No court is going to say that it's own conviction is not based upon clear and convincing evidence. For these reasons we oppose.'

- Archbishop Friar

Date10:15:09, February 18, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty
MessageWe can go either way

Date00:21:28, February 19, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty
Messageclear and convincing evidence would be where all forensic and ohtetr evidence points in favour of the prosecution and it is pretty obvious the person in the dock was capable of such a thing. This merely restricts the deathe penalty to being used in a case of utter conviction for the proscecutions argument.

Date17:39:06, February 19, 2006 CET
FromDaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty
Message'We agree in principle with the treaty, but oppose it simply because it is legally weak and could easily be manipulated. There are too many loopholes and vague statements.'

- Archbishop Friar

Date11:54:16, February 25, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty
Messageok well shall move to vote.

Date01:52:17, February 26, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Ratification of the Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty
MessageI've read the text, and can live with it (never mind the pun)...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 67

no
    

Total Seats: 185

abstain
  

Total Seats: 47


Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

Random quote: "All this concern with the effects of global warming is another manifestation of being politically correct." - David Young

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58