Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 02:17:48
Server time: 01:42:11, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Vilnius | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Constitutional Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union Populaire Democrate

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4235

Description[?]:

We would like to debate about how to protect the current democratic state of Kanjor with reforms of the current constitution

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:21:32, July 01, 2017 CET
FromUnion Populaire Democrate
ToDebating the Constitutional Reform
MessageHonourable Members of the senate,

The current government of Kanjor and all Parliamentary members of the Union Populaire Democrate would like to debate about the necessity of reforming the current Electoral system by means of proposition by the honourable members of the majority and the opposition to reach a consensus as soon a possible

Mr. Prime Minister
Clement Potinier

Date14:23:13, July 01, 2017 CET
FromUnion Populaire Democrate
ToDebating the Constitutional Reform
MessageHonourable Members of the senate,

The current government of Kanjor and all Parliamentary members of the Union Populaire Democrate would like to debate about the necessity of reforming the current Electoral system by means of proposition by the honourable members of the majority and the opposition to reach a consensus as soon a possible

Mr. Prime Minister
Clement Potinier

Date14:36:00, July 01, 2017 CET
FromGrand Parti Libertaire de Kanjor
ToDebating the Constitutional Reform
MessageHonourable Members of the Senate,

The PPK thanks the Government for holding this debate and hopes that it will continue this level of activity in the future. When regarding the current electoral system, the PPK feels that the current system is relatively secure. We would be open to talks regarding seat changes providing that the number in the Senate does not decrease. When it comes to frequency we feel that four years in a sensible time frame for a government, providing it ample opportunity to bring through reform that it so wishes.

We are curious about the UPD's phrasing as "the necessity of reforming the current Electoral system." Before we delve further into debate, I would request further clarification from the Prime Minister over why reform is required, and what reform the UPD would suggest.

Mlle. Violaine Roux
Deputy Leader of the PPK

Date16:39:35, July 01, 2017 CET
FromUnion Populaire Democrate
ToDebating the Constitutional Reform
MessageMembers of the Senate,

The use of necessity was to determine whetther the country needed or not some electoral reforms which we may define by the following issues;

1. Number of seats of the senate
2.The length of the Legislative term
3. Appointment of Mayors throughout the nation
4.Nobility

We simply would like to debate with the whole senate and also parties which currently have no seats in the senate to determine whether amendments should be made or not.

Mr.Prime Minister
Clement Potinier

Date17:09:40, July 01, 2017 CET
FromGrand Parti Libertaire de Kanjor
ToDebating the Constitutional Reform
MessageHonourable Members,

We thank the Prime Minister for providing clarity. The Parti Pragmatique Kanjor's position is as follows:

In regards to the number of seats, we feel that an increase to 400 would be acceptable to increase representation without slowing down the system. In regards to the legislative term we are satisfied with the four years. We are also satisfied with the current appointment of mayors by their citizens. Regarding nobility, we would see it legalised but not possible to grant any titles. Whilst people should have the choice of wearing these names should they so wish, the government should not continue to hand them out.

I hope this has given the Senate ample information on our stance, and look forward to knowing the government's stance on these four matters in due course.

Mlle. Violaine Roux
Deputy Leader of the PPK

Date18:13:06, July 01, 2017 CET
FromFront Nouveau Canrillaise
ToDebating the Constitutional Reform
MessageThe Mouvement Centriste is in favor of a 400 sear Senate and agrees to 4 years of each legislative turn.


Antoine Forestier
Leader of MC
Founder

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 300

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation.

      Random quote: "A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned to walk forward." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 59