We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: No to curfews
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's National Unity Movement (RDL)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2188
Description[?]:
The current curfew policy could be used to repress protest by our people |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: No curfew policies may be established.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:54:42, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the No to curfews |
Message | Support. |
Date | 14:08:42, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Advanced Intellectual Party | To | Debating the No to curfews |
Message | Why would we not want the power to enact a curfew if there is a state of emergency? |
Date | 16:06:12, February 19, 2006 CET | From | People's National Unity Movement (RDL) | To | Debating the No to curfews |
Message | Because the state cannot be separted from the people and truly serve their interests |
Date | 17:10:21, February 19, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the No to curfews |
Message | With the current value, we serve their interests. Safety, protection. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 339 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 261 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag |