We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: F-82: Animal Welfare Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4238
Description[?]:
| This bill seeks to reduce the burden on our already struggling ranchers and farmers by reducing the restrictions on raising livestock. This bill also seeks to maintain a standard which can still be seen as quality treatment of animals. It is this bill's intention to seek a balance between animal welfare and the quality of life of those in our agricultural portion of society. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on animal welfare in livestock farming.
Old value:: The government enforces high animal welfare standards.
Current: Animal welfare laws for livestock farming are set by local governments.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate animal welfare standards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:56:10, July 05, 2017 CET | From |  Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-82: Animal Welfare Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I hereby open this proposal to debate. Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader |
| Date | 21:25:27, July 05, 2017 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the F-82: Animal Welfare Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Me and my party firmly oppose every attempts to dismantle any passed SLP law. (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=525562) Ann Richardson (SL-LA) Social Liberal Senate leader Senator for Constantine |
| Date | 21:38:20, July 05, 2017 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-82: Animal Welfare Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Can the honorable Senator Richardson provide any other reason for opposing this bill other than it's previous legislation that they passed? What is their reasoning for opposing it? Do they not care about the farmers and ranchers that they are hurting? Do they not care about the detriment to Hutorian economy that's cause? Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader |
| Date | 22:07:37, July 05, 2017 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the F-82: Animal Welfare Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Our party consider high animal welfare standards a pride for our nation, because especially means that we care raising the quality of what we eat. If we treat animals better, our food quality will be better, it's a simply equation. We have the possibility to make Hutori the country of good food and that's why me and my party will oppose every attempts to cancel what we made. Ann Richardson (SL-LA) Social Liberal Senate leader Senator for Constantine |
| Date | 22:07:37, July 05, 2017 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the F-82: Animal Welfare Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Our party consider high animal welfare standards a pride for our nation, because especially means that we care raising the quality of what we eat. If we treat animals better, our food quality will be better, it's a simply equation. We have the possibility to make Hutori the country of good food and that's why me and my party will oppose every attempts to cancel what we made. Ann Richardson (SL-LA) Social Liberal Senate leader Senator for Constantine |
| Date | 22:18:13, July 05, 2017 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-82: Animal Welfare Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We agree with SLP that we should have animal welfare standards but, the higher they are the more restrictive they are. The more restrictive regulation is the less competition there is, less competition equals lower employment, lower quality and higher prices. If the SLP wants higher quality you can't regulate your way to it just like you can't tax your way to success. Furthermore, our farmers are barely getting by due to these oppressive regulations. Not only do we want to improve our economic output but, we also wish to improve the quality of life of our farmers and ranchers. Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 254 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 346 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
| Random quote: "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." - Emma Goldman |