Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 01:56:39
Server time: 02:03:20, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Marriage Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Telamon

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2062

Description[?]:

We must stop homosexual marriage, as it is wrong, and i dont like gay people

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:28:20, June 01, 2005 CET
FromCorporative Tyrannical Party
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageWe don't care about morale.

Date14:24:28, June 01, 2005 CET
FromTelamon National Party
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageThis should be passed, only a man and a woman should be married.

Date16:04:56, June 01, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageNo, marriage is perhaps an unfortunate term and maybe the phrase civil union is better, but we are talkiing about CIVIL here. I.e. the right of people to gain the relevent benefits from the state with regards to tax and inheritance etc, so allowing them to live in a relationship with whomsoever they want. Whether that marriage is valid in the eyes of God is a matter for religion not the state. The state has an obligation to ensure that everyone regardless of their sexuality is treated equally, regardless of what religion may say on the issue as church and state are seperate.

Date16:06:22, June 01, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageOh and TCP just because you don't like homosexuals is not a reason to prevent them from engaging in a loving relationship IN THEIR OWN TIME AND BEHIND CLOSED DOORS ETC. They are free to do as they please

Date18:22:20, June 01, 2005 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Marriage Act
Messageno

Date22:52:58, June 01, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageThis is clearly absurd and I see it as no coincidence that this bill has come about soon after the formation of our party. It is clear that you feel threatened by our presence and simply don't like us. I have no problems with you personally disliking our party but don't take your childish grudge out on the good homosexual citizens of our nation. With regards to this bill, there is absolutely no reason why gays shouldn't be allowed to marry. As citizens of this nation they should have the same rights as others to be with whoever they wish and to confirm that bond. You have even said yourself that there is no reason for you proposing this other than your prejudice. I suppose next you'll be shipping all our nations gays off to ghettos.

Date22:53:23, June 01, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageSurprisingly I intend to vote no on this bill

Date23:55:09, June 01, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageWe agree with TCP's proposal, even if the reason for doing so, is very....ummm original?

Date13:25:50, June 02, 2005 CET
FromTelamon National Party
ToDebating the Marriage Act
MessageI will be voting yes to this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 46

no
   

Total Seats: 88

abstain
 

Total Seats: 17


Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: “Tell these old, grey men that their time is over. Tell them to give us back our future, and then get lost!” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75