We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Service Directive
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2190
Description[?]:
| These proposals is to secure the rising population. The more Hobrazians we are the more prospery we will be. Furthermore is it important to secure the living standards of our elders with a state pension system. It is to secure that every elderly citizen can mangle the system, that we propose this bill. This also encourage equality amongst our inhabitants. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: The state guarantees child benefit to families classified as low-income or poor.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to both low-income families and large families.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory, public pension system.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:42:51, February 19, 2006 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the National Service Directive |
| Message | "These proposals is to secure the rising population" - Why do we want a larger population? The larger the population the more pressure there will be on resources and services "The more Hobrazians we are the more prospery we will be." - Any improvements gained from a larger population will be offset by the increase in costs of public services. Article 2 - Why deny people the choice to invest extra money in a pension fund elsewhere? |
| Date | 13:55:08, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the National Service Directive |
| Message | It would give the state far more money to invest if we were the sole pension fund. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 177 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 223 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "The one bonus of not lifting the ban on gays in the military is that the next time the government mandates a draft we can all declare homosexuality instead of running off to Canada." - Lorne Bloch |