We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Media Law
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pancildanian Socialist Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4245
Description[?]:
The state must guarantee its citizens at least one public television channel and at least one state radio station. These two companies will be set up, namely Cildanian Broadcasting Corporation SA And Cildanian Radio SA , Do not aim to compete with private media, but only co-exist on the telecommunications map and strengthen the field further. In addition, the sole aim will be to provide independent information and entertainment to the people, away from the worst propaganda and the political passions of the parties, in order to secure a pillar of stability and security in the difficult times we experience. Ultimately, they will employ a well-deserved number of employees, without favoring customer relationships in the state, maintaining high quality and promoting ethical values. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Radio stations.
Old value:: All radio stations are private.
Current: All radio stations are private.
Proposed: The government subsidises a national radio station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Television stations.
Old value:: All television media are private.
Current: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Proposed: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:06:29, July 22, 2017 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Media Law |
Message | Why waste taxpayer dollars on a public station/channel when the private sector can produce it at a cheaper cost? Not all private companies have bias, there are many who produce independent content because it brings more business. The public channels would most likely be supportive of the government rather than independent, which, in the case of a tyrannical government, would leave the people blind to its tyranny. |
Date | 17:19:23, July 22, 2017 CET | From | Pancildanian Socialist Movement | To | Debating the Media Law |
Message | I would like to say that you are right. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 300 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt |