Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5471
Next month in: 00:07:45
Server time: 15:52:14, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | ImperialLodamun | Liu Che | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Law on Security Council Support

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hosian-Konservative Allianz

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4248

Description[?]:

X

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:39:11, July 25, 2017 CET
From Sozialdemokratische Arbeitsfront (SDA)
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageWe think we should keep Indrala as a nominee

Date20:17:06, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: Your votes clearly show that none of you have paid any attention to work affairs.

The switch from Istalia to Vanuku was due to the collapse of Vanuku, Vanuku has now resurged and has been one of the oldest allies of the Dorvish state, for those who don't know or didn't care to read, a good portion of Vanuku was once a Dorvish colony...therefore we would support those who would've naturally supported us.

Second, Indrala has been dead for the better part of 20-30 years. Why would we support a nation that cannot project power anymore and is in sharp decline economically and militarily. Rildanor is resurgent and we have allies there that are supportive of our mission an Dorvik's place in the international order.

Date20:30:08, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: world* not work...RIP spelling.

Date20:40:33, July 25, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: 'once' being key in your Vanuku assessment. Most of the players today weren't around in the colonial era which you're so intent on reverting back to.

Date20:48:32, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: You're smoking crack apparently.

Vanuku, the players who were there left the game temporarily, they've since returned and start to RP again, aka a current, in-game nation is far more powerful than Indrala currently is.

No one is attempting to revert to the "Colonial Era" or whatever the hell you're talking about because it's apparent you don't know what you're talking about.

Date20:50:15, July 25, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: Just because you've been here a long time doesn't mean you known everything. I don't appreciate the hostility, either. Your buddies in other nations don't make those nations some kind of holy grail we must be allies with.

Date20:52:30, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: No, you're right I don't know everything. I do know however, far more than you do regarding the geopolitical and international structure of affairs in regards to Security Council support. That's for sure.

No, what they do however, is make those nations potential interactions for RP.

Date20:55:00, July 25, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: Maybe if you stopped secluding yourself and doing everything on your own, I'd be able to do more.

And it's all YOUR RP. The RP you refuse to let me in on and go off and do yourself despite not being the foreign ministry.

Date20:57:26, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: Well, I'm going to say this publicly so you can't claim anything:

1) The arms deal with Kazulia, you were notified and it wasn't anything that you really needed to be involved it. It was simply a news post that said hey, we're doing an arms deal. You were notified and approved.

2) The Northern Council, I reached out, I asked and you approved. You could've said no.

3) I've made every attempt to invite people into the RP, as I've done numerous times. Instead of promoting RP or our Nationmaster actually doing something, numerous RP attempts have been stalled and halted by both of you.

Date21:00:48, July 25, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC:

1) I'm the foreign minister it is something to involve me.

2) You forced me to. You would've done it anyway.

3) Utter BS. And maybe everyone should know about your idea of secretly getting rid of our NM without his consent. And please, tell me what I've stalled.

Date21:02:05, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC:

1) I messaged you, where did you respond you wanted to be involved? Please.

2) I literally asked, you could've said no.

3) Yeah, it isn't a secret. Mostly everyone here know and I've involved Moderation due to his failure as a Nationmaster.

Date21:05:13, July 25, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC:

Why are you suddenly going off on me? I let you do what you wanted. Why am I the bad guy? I should've said no to your asinine ideas. Dorvik isn't 'your nation' to puppeteer.

Date21:07:30, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: I'm finished with speaking with you, I'm notifying Moderation about my stance on the Nationmaster and I'll let them handle that issue. It's apparent that you're far more willing to be openly hostile and attack first, as apparent in PMs.

I apologize to everyone here that the topic go so off-topic.

Date21:10:50, July 25, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: That's a shame. All I wanted was for you to actually involve me in RP, but you decided to viciously attack me.

Date21:13:10, July 25, 2017 CET
From Hosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: Nah, it's precisely what happened last time. I approached you about something, you instead proceeded to claim I was trying to control you, the nation, this isn't 2010, yada yada. It's very hostile and quite frankly very off-putting. I really hope that someday we can cooperate and you can speak to me like a respectable player when I approach you with ideas.

For those interested in discussing this, please PM me. This is not the place to do it. Thanks.

Date21:31:49, July 25, 2017 CET
From Grüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Law on Security Council Support
MessageOOC: On reconsidering, we will support his and accept what you've said. It seems to fit together. I was just very angry I felt you discluded me from RP, and that made me lash out. Sorry.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 393

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 206


    Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English.

    Random quote: "The Religious Right dislikes both abortions and homosexuality. But who has fewer abortions than gays?" - George Carlin

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 72