We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Power Act of 2188
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2189
Description[?]:
| Colleagues, Since there hasn't been any development in the research for new resources to provide energy for our national infrastructure, we must encourage the use of the now available most clean and inexhaustible nuclear power. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Current: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Proposed: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:11:58, February 19, 2006 CET | From | People's National Unity Movement (RDL) | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act of 2188 |
| Message | How can nuclear power be described as clean when it produces waste which cannot be safely dealt with and remains dangerous for tens of thousands of years, we must take a holistic approach to environmental problems not just replace one environmental problem with another. |
| Date | 17:01:41, February 19, 2006 CET | From |  Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act of 2188 |
| Message | Nuclear power is the most clean energy source in combination with a decent output. |
| Date | 17:14:59, February 19, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act of 2188 |
| Message | Is not. Green energy is. Since it has no filth what so ever, and due to the year we live in, it's production is just as decent. Besides, green energy allows us to not be dependant on one structure which supplies energy. Green energy can be produced at home (camouflaged sun energy cells), and in a lot of other places. This way, smaller regions can provide for their own energy, instead of whole territoria being dependant on one structure. |
| Date | 22:08:03, February 19, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act of 2188 |
| Message | I don't see any green energy... |
| Date | 16:32:40, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act of 2188 |
| Message | ..you know what I meant. Energy generated by the sun, the wind, the sea, the earth. |
| Date | 18:59:50, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act of 2188 |
| Message | Surely there is room for both nuclear and renewable energy resources. Sometimes it's just not reasonable to have 1000 windmills in a large metropolitan city if there is no space to put them in. |
| Date | 12:51:55, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Beach Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Power Act of 2188 |
| Message | I remember us putting a nuclear plant on the island of Meriath and those 3 eyed toads never complained. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 266 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 284 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 50 |
| Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
| Random quote: "Mine is the first generation able to contemplate the possibility that we may live our entire lives without going to war or sending our children to war." - Tony Blair |