We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Hutori Absolute Defense Act of 4252. (The HADA Act)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutori Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4253
Description[?]:
| This bill is to propose a change to our stance on willingness to use nuclear weapons in warfare. Our policy should be: We reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason we see fit. A strictly retaliatory policy is not strong enough. We never know if we will come across a situation where we may need to strike first, preemptively. Let's not handcuff ourselves by taking a first strike threat off the table. Proposed by members of the Hutori Freedom Party. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:10:23, August 06, 2017 CET | From |  Hutori Freedom Party | To | Debating the The Hutori Absolute Defense Act of 4252. (The HADA Act) |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I propose to open this bill up to debate. -Hutori Freedom Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 186 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 419 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360 |
| Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election) |